Skip to content
A2552Assembly2009-2010 Session

Relates to the board of education in the city of Rochester; repealer

Sponsor David GanttAD-133Affects Education
Status
Assembly Floor Calendar
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 3 of 7

Floor calendar · Jan 12

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
David Gantt

Assembly Member · Assembly District 133

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Amended on third reading 2552a
  2. Ordered to third reading cal.214
  3. Returned to assembly
  4. Died in senate
  5. Referred to rules
  6. Delivered to senate
  7. Passed assembly
  8. Ordered to third reading rules cal.365
  9. Rules report cal.365
  10. Reported
  11. Reported referred to rules
  12. Reported referred to ways and means
Show 1 earlier action
  1. Referred to education

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

BILL NUMBER:A2552A

Title of bill

An act to amend the education law, in relation to the board of education in the city of Rochester; and to repeal certain provisions of such law relating thereto

Purpose or general idea of bill

To streamline the decision-making process at the Rochester City School District and make the Chief Executive Officer accountable for the management and operation of the schools.

Summary of specific provisions

Section one would make it clear that boards of education of city school districts should not exercise executive powers and perform executive or administrative functions.

Sections two, five, six and seven would give the superintendent of the Rochester School District the following duties and powers:

* prepare and deliver to the board of education for review and approval an annual itemized budget and an educational facilities plan.

* prepare a bimonthly summary of the district's actual revenues, expenses, and indebtedness and compare such information to the annual budget.

* authorize contracts for goods and services in amounts less than $50,000.

* develop with the board of education policies and procedures for the hiring, firing and evaluation of all district employees.

* appoint certified and uncertified supervising staff and related admin- istrative staff who are excluded from collective bargaining agreements.

Section three would remove the ability of the board of education of the Rochester City School District to abolish the office of auditor and prohibit the auditor from holding any other position or perform in any capacity within the school district. The auditor would be given the powers to access and demand certain financial documents of the school district.

This section also provides that if the board of education decides to appoint an examiner, then the examiner would be allowed to access and demand all documents and information material to any investigation or hearing. The examiner would have to conclude and report the result of investigations or hearing to the board of education within 6 months of the authorization of the investigation or hearing. This section would also require the board of education of the Rochester City School District to: authorize contracts for goods and services in amounts of

$50,000 or more; review, require amendments from the superintendent, and to file with the mayor the annual itemized budget and capital plan for the district submitted by superintendent; develop jointly, with the superintendent, policies and procedures for the hiring, firing and eval- uation of all employees of the district.

Section four would require that the superintendent of the Rochester City School District serve for a term pursuant to a contract, and would require a two-thirds vote of the members of the board of education for the removal of the superintendent.

Effects of present law which this bill would alter

Amends §§2554, 2565, 2566 and 2573 of the Education Law.

Justification

This bill will empower the educators and school professionals by taking the politics out of our school decision-making process. It will clarify lines of authority and responsibility, establish an effective system of checks and balances over the powers and duties of educational policymak- ers and facilitate decision-making that is based on goals not on poli- tical expediency.

The management problems faced by the Rochester city school district have more to do with overlapping responsibilities and the difficulty in establishing accountability for actions and decisions than with individ- ual actors. The new structure of governance set forth in this proposal would clarify those lines of responsibility and allow the school district to begin functioning properly.

Prior legislative history

2007-2008; A.742A

Fiscal implications for state and local governments

Undetermined.

Effective date

July 1, 2009.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.