Skip to content
A2576Assembly2009-2010 SessionSame asS2392

Permits a plaintiff to recover directly against a third party defendant found to be liable to the defendant in certain actions

Sponsor Helene WeinsteinAD-41Affects Legal
Status
In Assembly Committee
Judiciary
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Judiciary

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Helene Weinstein

Assembly Member · Assembly District 41

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Referred to judiciary
  2. Referred to judiciary

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

S2392Senate

Permits a plaintiff to recover directly against a third party defendant found to be liable to the defendant in certain actions

In Senate Committee · Codes · Sponsor John A. DeFrancisco

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

BILL NUMBER:A2576 REPLACEMENT 5/21/10

Title of bill

An act to amend the civil practice law and rules, in relation to permitting a plaintiff to recover against a third party defendant in certain cases

Purpose of bill

This bill would add a new Section 1405 to the Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) to expressly permit a plaintiff, as judgment creditor against defendant, to recover and collect an unsatisfied judgment or portion of a judgment directly against a third-party defendant found liable for contribution or indemnification.

Read the full memo (657 words)

Summary of provisions of bill

Section 1: Adds a new Section 1405 to the CPLR to permit a plaintiff to recover and collect an unsatisfied judgment or a portion of a judgment against a third-party defendant or co-defendant, when a plaintiff has entered judgment against a defendant which is unsatisfied thirty days after service on the defendant-judgment debtor, and where judgment has been entered in favor of the defendant-judgment debtor against a co-defendant or third-party defendant on a cause of action for contribution or indemnification. Under certain circumstances where the plaintiff's judgment remains unsatisfied thirty days after it has been served on the defendant-judgment debtor, and where the defendant judgment debtor has a cause of action for contribution or indemnification which has not been reduced to judgment, then the plaintiff-judgment creditor may attach, or take an assignment from the defendant-judgment debtor of the cause of action for contribution or indemnification and prosecute the action in the plaintiff's own name or in the name of the defendant judgment debtor. Direct recovery, however, is not authorized against a third-party defendant in those circumstances in which the third-party claim would have been barred by Section 11 of the Workers' Compensation Law.

Section 2: The effective date for this Act is immediately, and shall apply to all judgments entered by plaintiffs on or after such date.

Existing law

Section 1401 of the CPLR provides, with certain exceptions under the General Obligations Law and the Worker's Compensation Law, that two or more persons who are subject to liability for damages for the same personal injury, injury to property or wrongful death, may claim contribution among them whether or not an action has been brought or a judgment has been rendered against the person from whom contribution is sought Section 1403 of the CPLR provides that a cause of action for contribution may be asserted in a separate action or by cross-claim, counter-claim or third-party claim in a pending action.

Justification

A plaintiffs recovery of a judgment that ultimately comes from a third party defendant should not depend on the fortuity of the solvency of the defendant/third party plaintiff. Accordingly, this measure would allow a plaintiff to recover on a judgment for contribution or indemnification directly against the third-party defendant, whether or not the defendant/third party plaintiff has satisfied the underlying judgment for which contribution or indemnification is sought. Thus, in the ease where a defendant/third party plaintiff is insolvent and is unable to pay the judgment to the

plaintiff, the plaintiff could still seek to recover directly that portion of the judgment, as determined by the principles of contribution and indemnification, owed by the third party defendant to the defendant/third party plaintiff. This measure would not alter in any way the substantive law of Workers' Compensation. The 1996 Omnibus Worker's Compensation Reform Act already limits claims for contribution and indemnification against an employer to only those cases involving "grave injuries." In cases where there are not grave injuries the employer is not liable as a matter of substantive law, and therefore this measure would not affect such employers at all.

Legislative history

2009: A.2576/S.6310-A A.Judi/S.Codes 2007-08: A.6310/S.2065- A. Calendar/ S. Calendar 2005: A.11076/S.7487- A. Calendar! S. Codes 2004: A.7493/S.5006 A. Calendar/S. Codes 2003: A.7493/S.5006 A. Calendar/S. Codes

Fiscal implications for state and local governments

None,

Effective date

This Act will take effect immediately and shall apply to all judgments entered by plaintiffs on or after such date.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.