Skip to content
A443Assembly2009-2010 SessionSame asS324

Allows punitive damages to be awarded whenever a case of discrimination is established

Sponsor Rhoda JacobsAD-42
Status
In Assembly Committee
Governmental Operations
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Governmental Operations

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Rhoda Jacobs

Assembly Member · Assembly District 42

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Referred to governmental operations
  2. Referred to governmental operations

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

S324Senate

Allows punitive damages to be awarded whenever a case of discrimination is established

In Senate Committee · Investigations And Government Operations · Sponsor Carl Kruger

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

BILL NUMBER:A443

Title of bill

An act to amend the executive law, in relation to permitting the awarding of punitive damages in all cases of discrimi- nation, rather than only housing cases

Purpose or general idea of bill

To deter all forms of discrimination by imposing punitive damages in all cases of discrimination under the human rights act.

Summary of specific provisions

This bill authorizes the imposition of punitive damages in all cases of discrimination, not just in housing discrimination cases.

Effects of present law which this bill would alter

Subparagraph (iv) of paragraph c of subdivision 4 of section 297 of the Executive Law.

Justification

Unfortunately, discrimination in society and in the workplace remains a widespread problem creating devastating economic and social conse- quences. The imposition of punitive damages would not only punish the wrongdoer for the gross misbehavior but also it would convey the appro- priate warning or message that society will not tolerate this conduct. Additionally, the imposition of punitive damages will be a meaningful deterrent.

It is incompatible with the purpose of the Human Rights Law to restrict the application of punitive damages to only housing cases since all cases or categories of discrimination have equally important impli- cations.

Enactment of this measure will reaffirm the basic principle that anyone who violates the civil rights laws must be held responsible for his/her actions and that victims of discrimination deserve a full and fair reme- dy. To do anything less ignores the serious threat that discrimination continues to pose in society.

Federal law (Civil Rights Act of 1964 et seq., and the Americans with Disabilities Act) allows for punitive damages. The same is true under the New York City Commission for Human Rights.

Finally, with the enactment of this measure, New York would join several other states (e.g. Ohio) that assess punitive damages.

Prior legislative history

2007-2008 - A.2575, Referred to Governmental Operations 2005-2006 - A.1023, Referred to Governmental Operations 2003-2004 - A.2819, Referred to Governmental Operations 2001-2002 - A.660, Referred to Governmental Operations 1999-2000 - A.1318, Held for consideration in Governmental Operations

Fiscal implications for state & local governments

The state will realize some revenue as a result of the imposition of punitive damages. Furthermore, because the additional punishment might have a deterrent factor, there might be less discrimination complaints filed.

Effective date

Immediately.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.