What's happening
Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.
Why it matters
Albany, before your first meeting.
Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.
Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.
Who cares
Headline styles
Sponsors
No co-sponsors yet.
History
- Amended on third reading 6011a
- Vote reconsidered - restored to third reading
- Returned to assembly
- Recalled from senate
- Recommitted to judiciary
- Substitution reconsidered
- 3rd reading cal.432
- Substituted for S4781
- Referred to judiciary
- Delivered to senate
- Passed assembly
- Ordered to third reading cal.418
Show 8 earlier actions
- Returned to assembly
- Died in senate
- Referred to judiciary
- Delivered to senate
- Passed assembly
- Advanced to third reading cal.396
- Reported
- Referred to judiciary
Companion bill
The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.
Makes provisions regarding small claims jurisdiction where claimant is a tenant or lessee of real property owned by defendant that is situated within certain limits
In Assembly Committee · Judiciary · Sponsor Liz Krueger
Full text
The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.
Sponsor's memo
BILL NUMBER:A6011A
Title of bill
An act to amend the uniform city court act, the uniform district court act, the uniform justice court act and the New York city civil court act, in relation to obtaining jurisdiction over certain defendants
Purpose or general idea of bill
To permit residential tenants fair access to the small claims courts by letting them sue in the small claims court located in the area that the rental unit is located.
Summary of specific provisions
Makes provisions for small claims court jurisdiction when the claimant is or was a tenant or lessee, the defend- ant is the property owner, the claim relates to such tenancy or lease, and the property is situated within the county.
Justification
Current law places an unfair burden on the tenant in terms of the return of their security deposit or other claims, which requires that tenants file a claim in the jurisdiction where the land- lord's business is located. In SOLOMON V. CORRELL, the judge invites the Legislature to address this problem.
Prior legislative history
1997: A.7564 - ordered to 3rd reading 1999-2000: A.7884 - passed Assembly 2001-02: A.8805 - referred to Judiciary Committee 2003: A.5732 - referred to Judiciary Committee 2004: A.5732-A - advanced to 3rd reading 2005-06: A.4124-A - passed Assembly 2007-08: A.5478 - passed Assembly
Fiscal implications
None.
Effective date
Immediately.
Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.