Skip to content
A9154Assembly2009-2010 Session

Relates to admissibility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain scans in criminal proceedings

Sponsor Michael BenjaminAD-79Affects Legal
Status
In Assembly Committee
Codes
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Codes

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Michael Benjamin

Assembly Member · Assembly District 79

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Referred to codes
  2. Referred to codes

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

BILL NUMBER:A9154

Title of bill

An act to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to admissibility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain scans in criminal proceedings

Purpose or general idea of bill

To ban the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain scans in a criminal proceeding where a defendant's or witness's truthfulness or knowledge of a specific event is at issue.

Summary of specific provisions

Section 1. The criminal procedure law is amended by adding a new section 60.77. Section 60.77 is titled rules of evidence; admissibility of magnetic resonance imaging (MR1) brain scans. In a criminal proceeding in which a defendant's or witness's truthful- ness or knowledge of a specific event is in issue, evidence of the defendant's or witness's brain activity obtained through the use of a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain scan, shall be deemed inadmissi- ble.

Justification

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is primarily a medical imaging technique used to visualize the internal structure and function of the body. MRI scans are used to image every part of the body, and is particularly useful for neurological conditions because it can measure brain activity and locate abnormal functions or patterns of activity. While still in the experimental stage, scientists have begun to use brain scans to interpret brain activity patterns pertaining to specific information. This technology was used in a criminal trial in India, where a man was found guilty of murder because the judge cited a MRI scan as proof that the defendant's brain held guilty knowledge concern- ing the crime. While the Fifth Amendment protects against self-incrimi- nation, in order to protect private thought in New York, it is necessary that a statute explicitly prohibiting the use of MRI brain scans to obtain incriminating information against a defendant be implemented.

Brain scans are not 100 percent accurate. In most cases (i.e. health problems), results of a MRI scan can be checked using other testing equipment. But brain abnormalities found during scans related to crimi- nal behavior can not be double checked by any other methods. These abnormalities are rare and have a high chance that the MRI scan results are inaccurate. By allowing MRI scans as evidence in court, many people will be found guilty or innocent on unverifiable data.

Prior legislative history

New Bill

Fiscal implications

None

Effective date

This act shall take effect immediately.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.