Skip to content
S1190Senate2009-2010 SessionSame asA3483

Allows an action for unlawful discriminatory practice to be brought within three years after dismissal for administrative convenience

Sponsor Antoine M. ThompsonSD-60+2 co-sponsorsAffects Legal
Status
Senate Floor Calendar
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Vetoed via A3483

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Antoine M. Thompson

Senator · Senate District 60

History

  1. Substituted by A3483
  2. Advanced to third reading
  3. 2nd report cal.
  4. 1st report cal.61
  5. Referred to investigations and government operations

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A3483Assembly

Allows an action for unlawful discriminatory practice to be brought within three years after dismissal for administrative convenience

Vetoed · Sponsor Crystal Peoples-Stokes

Vetoed

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the executive law, in relation to institution of court actions under section 297 thereof

Purpose or general idea of bill

To provide a time limitation within which complainants can institute a court action after dismissal of their complaints for administrative convenience by the state Division of Human Rights.

Summary of specific provisions

This legislation would amend subdivision 9 of Section 297 of the Executive Law to provide that when a complaint is dismissed by the Division of Human Rights for administrative convenience, the complainant may institute a court action within three years after the dismissal.

Justification

Sometimes complaints before the State Division of Human Rights are dismissed for administrative convenience after investigation and conciliation efforts. The Division has broad powers regarding its ability to dismiss and may impose such a dismissal against the wishes of a complainant to pursue their complaint. This legislation is intended to insure that the rights of the aggrieved party will be maintained to obtain redress if their complaint is dismissed after the statute of limitations set forth in the Human Rights Law has expired.

Prior legislative history

2007/2008: A.3331 (Peoples) 2005: A.6065 (Sanders) -- Passed Assembly 2003-04: A.1949 (Sanders) -- Passed Assembly 2001-02: A.2341 (Sanders) -- Passed Assembly 1999-00: A.675 (Sanders) -- Passed Assembly 1997-98: A.1586-A (Sanders) -- Passed Assembly

Fiscal implications

None.

Effective date

Immediately.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.