Skip to content
S1274Senate2009-2010 SessionSame asA5460

Relates to limiting co-payments for child care subsidies

Sponsor Velmanette MontgomerySD-18+10 co-sponsorsAffects Health
Status
In Senate Committee
Children And Families
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Children And Families

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

History

  1. Referred to children and families
  2. Referred to children and families

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A5460Assembly

Relates to limiting co-payments for child care subsidies

In Assembly Committee · Children And Families · Sponsor Michele Titus

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the social services law, in relation to limiting co-payments for child care subsidies

Purpose

This bill eliminates co-payments for any family receiving child care assistance whose income is at or below the state income standard. This bill also caps the amount of co-payment a person can be held responsible for at ten percent of their household income.

Summary of provisions

Section 1 amends subdivision 6 of section 410-x of the social services law, by eliminating co-payments for those who receive child care assistance and have incomes at or below the state income standard, as well as capping such co-payments at ten percent of the household income.

Existing law

Currently the co-payment of a family receiving child care assistance is set by subtracting the poverty level for the household size from their income, and then choosing a multiplier between 10 and 35 percent (determined by the locality) to apply against the balance.

Justification

Under the current system of co-payments, there are families with incomes below the state income standard paying for child care that they cannot afford. Further, depending on the county a family lives in, they may be paying a significantly higher co-payment than the same size family in an area in which the cost of living is much less. For example, a family of three in Yonkers at 200% of poverty, in a county where the multiplier is 33%, has a co-payment of $4,726, and will pay $2,000 a year more than a family of the same size and income level as a family in New York: City. This is unfair. A cap of ten percent of the household income assures equitable treatment across the state.

Legislative history

2007-2008: S.3161 - Died in Committee 2006-2005: S.1298 - Died in Committee 2004-2003: S.5710 - Died in Committee

Fiscal implications

To be determined.

Effective date

This act shall take effect the first of January next succeeding the date on which it shall have become law.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.