Skip to content
S1339Senate2009-2010 SessionSame asA6763

Provides that a lender may receive not more than 20% of the future appreciation of property secured by a reverse mortgage granted to a person 60 years old or older

Sponsor Dean G. SkelosSD-9+1 co-sponsorAffects Health
Status
In Senate Committee
Aging
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Aging

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Dean G. Skelos

Senator · Senate District 9

1 Co-sponsor

History

  1. Referred to aging
  2. Committed to rules
  3. Advanced to third reading
  4. 2nd report cal.
  5. 1st report cal.13
  6. Referred to aging

Companion bill

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the real property law, in relation to reverse mortgage loans for persons sixty years of age or older

Purpose

This bill will limit shared appreciation in revenue mortgage.

Summary of provisions

This bill amends subdivision 2 of section 280 of the real property law to limit the shared appreciation any authorized lender may receive no more than 20 per cent of the appreciation during the term of the mortgage.

Justification

In 1994, the Real Property Law was amended to formalize the reverse mortgage law in The State of New York. (Reverse mortgage allows senior citizens to take equity out of their homes which they are living there through equal installments, a line of credit or a lump sum.)

Those mortgages are now being satisfied either by the mortgagor paying off the mortgage, selling the property themselves or through their estate. The Legislature has received depressing information: For example in 1996, an individual mortgagor received a lump sum payment of $114,000. In 2003, when the mortgagor decided to sell, the authorized lender issued a payout letter of $451,000. This included $113,000 in compounded interest and $223,000 of shared appreciation at the rate of 50%.

This bill would attempt to remedy this gouging by the authorized lender by reducing the shared appreciation from 50% to 20%. This would be a much more equitable distribution of the shared appreciation.

Legislative history

2007/2008 - S.642/A.6720 - Passed Senate Non-Controversial/Assembly Judiciary 2005-06 - S.4097 - Passed Senate

Fiscal implications

None.

Effective date

One hundred eightieth day after it shall have become a law.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.