What's happening
Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.
Why it matters
Albany, before your first meeting.
Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.
Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.
Who cares
Headline styles
Sponsors
No co-sponsors yet.
History
- Substituted by A2500
- Advanced to third reading
- 2nd report cal.
- 1st report cal.387
- Reported and committed to codes
- Referred to judiciary
Companion bill
The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.
Permits investigation and recovery of cost thereof by the attorney general in a case of money deposited as security and required to be held in trust in rentals
Signed by Governor · Sponsor J. Gary Pretlow
Full text
The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.
Sponsor's memo
Title of bill
An act to amend the general obligations law, in relation to money deposited as security in certain cases and enforcement of trust provisions by attorney general
Purpose
This bill would clarify the Attorney General's authority to take proof and issue subpoenas, and would further authorize the Attorney General to obtain costs, in connection with an action or a proceeding to compel compliance with the General Obligations Law regarding the collection of rent security deposits.
Summary
The bill amends General Obligations Law, §7-109, by adding language which: a) gives the Attorney General explicit authority to take proof, make a determination of the relevant facts and issue subpoenas in accordance with the CPLR in connection with the proposed institution of an action or proceeding to compel compliance with the provisions of the General Obligations Law regarding residential rent security deposits; and b) authorizes, in the court's discretion, an allowance for costs not exceeding $2,000 against each respondent found in an action or proceeding brought by the Attorney General to compel compliance with those provisions of the General Obligations Law, to have committed a violation.
Read the full memo (645 words)
Justification
§7-109 of the General Obligations Law was enacted in 1973 (originally as § 7-107) to grant to the Attorney General specific authority to bring an action or proceeding against any person, association or corporation that has violated or is violating any of the provisions of Title I of Article 7 of the General Obligations Law which protects a tenant's rent security deposit and requires a landlord to place said deposit in an interest bearing account. The enactment of section 7-109 has enabled the Attorney General to combat violations of the rent security deposits law. For the period January 1, 1988 through December 14, 1992, a total of 3,701 rent security complaints were received by the Department of Law. While the bulk of these cases were resolved through mediation, the Attorney General found it necessary on some occasions to institute legal proceedings to protect the rights of tenants who gave security deposits to their landlords. The handling of these cases require a significant expenditure of resources and time in order to ensure that tenants' rent security deposits are protected. The Attorney General was given important, increased enforcement obligations respecting tenant security deposits by Chapter 917 of the Laws of 1984. Two additional sections, 7-107 and 7-108, were added to the General Obligations Law by this chapter to ensure the protection of tenants' security deposits upon the conveyance of a residential building. These sections cast liability, with appropriate limits, upon the buyers of residential buildings. Existing case law holds that the Attorney General's standing to bring an action or proceeding to compel compliance with section 7-103 is derived solely from section 7-109, and that he may not sue for refunds of rent security deposits under Executive Law, §63(12). Furthermore, since CPLR 830.3 authorizes an allowance for costs in actions or proceedings brought under Executive Law, §63(12), and not in actions or proceedings brought under General Obligations Law, §7-109, some courts have held that the Attorney General is not permitted to seek costs in rent security cases. There is no apparent reason to deny the Attorney General a discretionary award of costs in rent security cases while permitting such an award in all other consumer frauds cases. No legislative history exists to indicate any desire to exclude such a costs award. This bill would correct the problem. This bill also makes it clear that the A.G. has authority under General Obligations Law, §7-109, to take proof and to issue subpoenas in preparation for the institution of an action or proceeding to compel compliance with the law.
Prior legislative history
New Bill.
Fiscal implications
None.
Effective date
Immediately, and shall apply only to actions or proceedings commenced on or after its effective date.
Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.