Skip to content
S2503Senate2009-2010 SessionSame asA2942

Relates to the payment of restitution or reparation in certain instances

Sponsor John A. DeFranciscoSD-50Affects Legal
Status
In Senate Committee
Codes
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Codes

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
John A. DeFrancisco

Senator · Senate District 50

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Referred to codes
  2. Referred to codes

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A2942Assembly

Relates to the payment of restitution or reparation in certain instances

In Assembly Committee · Codes · Sponsor Joan Christensen

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the penal law, in relation to the payment of reparation or restitution in certain instances

Purpose

To include certain persons and entities within the term "victim" to enable a sentencing court to order restitution or reparation.

Summary of provisions

Section 1 -- Amends section 60.27 of the Penal Law to expand the definition of "victim" for purposes of restitution or reparation.

Section 2 -- Effective date.

Justification

Restitution and reparation to individual crime victims should be a primary concern in our criminal justice system. Public and private agencies which respond to crime-related incidents, provide assistance, and prevent further damage should not be statutorily ineligible to be reimbursed for certain costs as ordered by a sentencing court.

Such a situation arose in Central New York where a volunteer fire department used several hundred dollars worth of chemicals to extinguish a fire set by arson. The court was precluded from ordering the defendant to reimburse the fire department for this cost under the existing statute. The law should not be so limited that a court is prohibited from ordering reparation in such situations.

Legislative history

S.3519 of 1995-96; S.485 of 1997-98; S.538 of 1999-00; S.437 of 2001-02; S.1143 of 2003-04; S.35 of 2005-2006 (Passed Senate) S.1825 of 2007-08 (Passed Senate)

Fiscal implications

None.

Effective date

Immediately.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.