Skip to content
S3645Senate2009-2010 Session

Reestablishes the commuter tax imposing an earnings tax on nonresidents

Sponsor Martin Malavé DilanSD-17Affects Legal
Status
In Senate Committee
Investigations And Government Operations
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Investigations And Government Operations

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Martin Malavé Dilan

Senator · Senate District 17

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Referred to investigations and government operations
  2. Referred to investigations and government operations

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the tax law and the general city law, in relation to imposing the earnings tax on nonresidents

Purpose

This legislation would create a New York City Commuter Tax to fund the Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority's operating; and capital costs.

Summary of provisions

Section One of the bill amends the tax law. Section Three creates Article 2-E of the General City Law, providing for a city earnings tax on nonresidents and directs all tax revenue to the MTA to be used for Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority operating and capital costs.

Existing law

Currently, there is no earnings tax on nonresidents who produce an income within cities of over one million or more.

Justification

The New York City Commuter Tax was established in 1966 as a tax on wages and on self employment earnings. It applies to those who work within the City limits, but are not residents of the City. The rates of this taxation were increased in 1971 and continued until the time of its repeal in 1999. It was estimated that 450}000 New Yorkers were paying the commuter tax which was providing New York City wit:h $360 million dollars in revenue. The repeal has resulted in harming the City's and consequently} the State's long term fiscal health. In 2009, if the commuter tax were reinstated, the MTA could raise more than $500 million for city fiscal year 2010.

There are several reasons why a commuter tax is needed:

* Many more people work in New York City than live there. A major portion of City services and expenses go toward servicing the commuter population - many of whom use the many bridges maintained by the Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority on a daily basis.

* Currently, the City requires an income tax to support the level of services provided and, in some cases, mandated. This income tax provides a distortionary incentive favoring out-of-city labor, with no local income tax. over city labor. Rather than introducing an economic inefficiency in the labor market, the commuter tax actually offsets a portion of a preexisting distortion.

* The funds from this tax would be directed to the Metropolitan Transportation at a time when they are facing an unprecedented $1.2 billion operating deficit. This tax will cover all maintenance and operating costs of the Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority with the remaining funds directed to pay additional MTA capital costs and/or bond payments.

Legislative history

New bill.

Fiscal implications

Substantial increase of revenue to the Metropolitan Transportation Authority.

Effective date

This act shall take effect immediately.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.