Skip to content
S3768Senate2009-2010 SessionSame asA7334

Provides that termination of service of members of the New York city police force because of superannuation may be at sixty-five years of age

Sponsor Diane J. SavinoSD-23+1 co-sponsorAffects Finance
Status
In Senate Committee
Civil Service And Pensions
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Civil Service And Pensions

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Diane J. Savino

Senator · Senate District 23

1 Co-sponsor

History

  1. Referred to civil service and pensions
  2. Referred to civil service and pensions

Companion bill

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the administrative code of the city of New York, in relation to allowing members of the police department to remain in service until age 65

Purpose or general idea of bill

The bill provides that termination of service of members of the New York City police force because of super-annuation may be at sixty-five years of age.

Summary of specific provisions

Amends section 14-124 of the administrative code of the city of New York to change the maximum age for police officers from sixty-three to sixty-five

Justification

Currently, under the administrative code of the city of New York (section 15-121), firefighters may remain in service until age 65. This legislation would give police officers of the city of New York parity with their fire fighting colleagues. Due to the fiscal and stressful nature of these jobs there is merit to having a maximum age limits, the additional two years provided for by this legislation will do little to hamper the job performance of the police officers.

Additionally, since the events of September 2001, many senior members have retired creating a leadership vacuum. Therefore, any efforts to retain veteran officers without compromising job safety and performance must be given serious consideration.

Prior legislative history

2007-08 Session: A.7213B/S.5375B - Referred to WAM - Referred to Rules 2006 Session: New Legislation 2007 Session: A.7213A/S.5375A - Referred to Governmental Employees - Referred to Civil Service and Pensions

Fiscal implications

If this bill were to be enacted in the 2009 legislative session there would be a cost saving to the City of New York of $500,000.

Effective date

Immediately.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.