Skip to content
S3949Senate2009-2010 SessionSame asA7939

Requires that the governor's article 7 appropriation bills be specifically itemized to assure accountability

Sponsor Suzi OppenheimerSD-37+2 co-sponsorsAffects Legal
Status
In Senate Committee
Judiciary
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Judiciary

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Suzi Oppenheimer

Senator · Senate District 37

History

  1. Opinion referred to judiciary
  2. To attorney-general for opinion
  3. Referred to judiciary
  4. Opinion referred to judiciary
  5. To attorney-general for opinion
  6. Referred to judiciary

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A7939Assembly

Requires that the governor's article 7 appropriation bills be specifically itemized to assure accountability

In Assembly Committee · Ways And Means · Sponsor Brian Kavanagh

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION OF THE SENATE AND ASSEMBLY proposing an amendment to section 3 of article 7 of the constitution, in relation to requiring that the appropriations bills submitted to the legislature by the governor set forth with enough specificity each appropriation

Purpose

To ensure accountability of public funds by requiring that all appropriations bills be specifically itemized by the purpose for which the funds are to be used.

Summary of provisions

This resolution proposes a constitutional amendment (article 7, section 3) to ensure accountability of public funds by requiring that all appropriations bills be specifically itemized by the purpose for which the funds are to be used. The specifications must be in plain language and refer to the commonly used names of the programs that are to receive the funds and the provision of law authorizing them.

Justification

It has become common practice for state budget bills to appropriate funds in broad and vague categories that do not identify with any specificity or clarity what programs the funds are to be used for and the statutory authorization for the programs. Some bills, such as the legislative appropriations bills in particular, as couched in vague generalizations. The current system reduces the opportunity for legislators and the public to understand and provide meaningful input into the budget process. It also reduces accountability in the use of public funds.

Legislative history

03/14/07 REFERRED TO JUDICIARY 03/19/07 TO ATTORNEY-GENERAL FOR OPINION 04/02/07 OPINION REFERRED TO JUDICIARY 01/09/08 REFERRED TO JUDICIARY 01/18/08 TO ATTORNEY-GENERAL FOR OPINION 02/20/08 OPINION REFERRED TO JUDICIARY

Fiscal implications

None.

Effective date

Resolved (if the Assembly concur), That the foregoing be referred to the first regular legislative session convening after the next succeeding general election of members of the assembly, and, in conformity with section 1 of article 19 of the constitution, be published for 3 months previous to the time of such election.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.