What's happening
Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.
Why it matters
Albany, before your first meeting.
Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.
Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.
Who cares
Headline styles
Sponsors
History
- Referred to civil service and pensions
- Referred to civil service and pensions
Full text
The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.
Sponsor's memo
Title of bill
An act to amend the retirement and social security law, in relation to forfeiture of pension rights or retirement benefits upon conviction of certain crimes related to public employment
Purpose
To establish a procedure whereby public misconduct by a public employee may disqualify him or her from all or part of their pension benefits.
Summary of provisions
Section one of the bill amends the Retirement and Social Security Law (R&SSL) by adding a new Article 3-B entitled the Pension Forfeiture for Public Misconduct Act.
Read the full memo (849 words)
A new § 156 of R&SSL establishes the title of the act.
A new §157 delineates the definitions used in Article 3-B.
A new § 158 establishes the procedures to be followed in order for a public employee convicted of misconduct to forfeit their pension.
A new § 159 allows for a miscellaneous provision.
Section two of the bill is the enacting provision.
Justification
New York State has no policy mandating the forfeiture of pension benefits by a public official who has been convicted of a crime. No matter how serious the offense or how grossly an official has abused his or her public office, the current laws which govern pension plans for state employees, as well as municipal employees outside New York City, make no provision for forfeiture. A state or local government employee who otherwise meets the age and length of service requirements for a pension contained in New York's R&SSL is entitled to collect pension benefits, at public expense, even ifhe or she has betrayed the public trust and been convicted of a crime related to the betrayal of that trust.
Here are just a few examples of corrupt public officials who are receiving or continue to be eligible for their taxpayer funded pensions.
* A former mayor of a large upstate city who pleaded guilty to federal racketeering charges and extorting at least $1.2 million from contractors doing business with the city during his 16 years in office.
* Several former highway superintendents who pleaded guilty to federal corruption charges for defrauding their local governments in connection with the purchase of materials and equipment.
* At least two supreme court justices convicted of taking bribes for fixing cases and one former administrative judge for one of the largest counties in the state convicted of perjury after an investigation into extortion involving cable television franchises.
* A former superintendent of a major metropolitan area's Sanitation Department's Bureau of Waste Management who pleaded guilty to three counts of federal racketeering for accepting over $660,000 in bribes and payoffs. In addition, he allowed millions of gallons of hazardous and chemical waste to be dumped in municipal solid waste landfills.
* A former deputy director of the a major metropolitan area's Department of General Services who pleaded guilty to federal racketeering charges of extorting over a million dollars from building owners seeking to lease space to the city and was sentenced to 12 years in prison.
* A former Housing Authority supervisor convicted in a federal bribery and extortion probe and sentenced to 5 years in prison and a fine of $55,000.
* The conviction of 23 Housing Authority employees for job-related crimes.
* A former fiscal administrator for a major metropolitan area's Department of Health's Maternal, Infant and Reproductive Health program who embezzled nearly $200,000 from taxpayers through fraudulent payments to a bogus catering company he created and for taking kickbacks from contractors.
New York's retirement systems at all levels of government should be explicitly based on the principle that the faithful and honest performance of a public employee's official duties is as much a precondition to eligibility for a pension as fulfilling the existing statutory age and length of service requirements. In the public sector, pensions are not merely a form of deferred compensation. They are a "reward for faithfulness to duty and honesty of performance." A public servant who, by engaging in serious criminal misconduct, abuses the power of office and violates the fiduciary duty owed to the public relinquishes any claim to a pension financed by the tax paying citizens of this state.
The purpose of a pension forfeiture statute is to withhold public tax dollars from the employee who has broken faith with the public and breached in a significant way the fiduciary duty owed to the citizens of the state.
Five other states -- Pennsylvania, Florida, Georgia, Illinois and Massachusetts -- have all enacted pension forfeiture statues which recognize that loyal, honest public service is an essential prerequisite to pension eligibility. In these five states, criminal misconduct related to a public employee's official duties operates to sever the employee's claim to a taxpayer-financed pension.
Legislative history
2005-06: Senate Civil Service & Pensions Cmte./Assembly Governmental Employees Cmte. 2007-08: Senate Civil Service & Pensions Cmte.
Fiscal implications
Fiscally neutral or potential decrease in the fiscal obligations of the retirement systems.
Effective date
This act shall take effect immediately and shall apply to all retirement system members who join on or after the day it shall have become law.
Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.