What's happening
Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.
Why it matters
Albany, before your first meeting.
Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.
Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.
Who cares
Headline styles
Sponsors
No co-sponsors yet.
History
- Referred to consumer protection
- Referred to consumer protection
Companion bill
The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.
Regulates and requires issuance of raincheck by retailer where advertised merchandise is not available for sale
In Senate Committee · Rules · Sponsor Sandy Galef
Full text
The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.
Sponsor's memo
Title of bill
An act to amend the general business law, in relation to availability for sale of advertised merchandise
Summary
This bill adds a new Section 397-b to the General Business Law. This bill would regulate and require the issuance of rainchecks by retailers in cases where advertised merchandise is not available for sale. This bill would require that any retailer who advertises an article of merchandise for sale at a price such articles are usually sold or offered for sale in the store, and does not have such article available throughout the advertised period must, on the request of the article's purchaser, offer to issue a raincheck in certain circumstances. The bill further requires that if a retailer advertises an item without indicating that there are limited quantities of that item available, such retailer must have in stock and readily available quantities sufficient to meet reasonably anticipated public demand.
This legislation defines raincheck, details the information which must be included on the raincheck and prescribes the manner in which affected retailers must inform consumers of the availability of rainchecks. Each retailer that advertises sale items would be required to clearly and conspicuously post a sign indicating where a raincheck can be obtained. Violation of any provision of the bill would subject a retailer to the provisions of Article 22-A of the General Business Law for having committed a false and misleading advertising practice and/or a civil penalty.
Read the full memo (623 words)
Justification
The practice of "bait and switch" advertising which is deceptive within the statutory proscription (as in Section 349(a) of the General Business Law) involves an advertisement and offer of a product which is not bona fide because what the merchant actually has on hand and intends to sell is significantly different from that which drew the potential customer in, and, hence, is a practice which does not include conduct of a seller in continually modifying proposed terms of a contract with the buyer as the negotiations proceed. This judicial decision was set forth in GOLDBERG V. MANHATTAN LINCOLN MERCURY (1985), and is taken from McKinney's. Enactment of this law would enable New York State to enforce long-standing Federal Trade Commission regulation and policy, court orders, and a 1972 New York City Regulation on bait advertising. Bait advertising is the practice of making an alluring offer to sell a product which the advertiser does not intend or want to sell in order to entice a consumer into an establishment where, it expected, other purchases will be made. Many retailers currently have policies regarding the issuance of rain-checks.
Although a great many of these policies were designed and operate with the interests of the consumer in mind, a number of retailers, albeit a minority, either do not have policies or employ policies which do not consider the consumer. It is because of this that many consumers look upon raincheck policies (even those which are consumer oriented) with jaundiced eyes. Indeed, the credibility of many retailers' rain- check policies has eroded, creating an industry-wide crisis of confidence. This situation serves the best interests of neither the consumer nor the retailer. Several studies have found that the FTC and New York City regulation, bait advertising guides and orders have not resulted in compliance with the generally accepted premise that when supplies of an advertised item will not meet reasonably anticipated demand, the advertisement should disclose that fact. This bill would serve to statutorily recognize these current rules and regulations and provide
for greater enforcement of them. Indeed, consumers would receive the protection they deserve from deceptive bait advertising.
Fiscal implications
None.
Effective date
This act shall take effect on the sixtieth day after it shall have become a law.
Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.