Skip to content
S4770Senate2009-2010 SessionSame asA8543

Relates to pre-existing condition provisions for group and blanket disability policies

Sponsor Neil D. BreslinSD-46Affects Finance
Status
In Senate Committee
Insurance
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Insurance

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Neil D. Breslin

Senator · Senate District 46

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Referred to insurance
  2. Referred to insurance

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A8543Assembly

Relates to pre-existing condition provisions for group and blanket disability policies

In Assembly Committee · Insurance · Sponsor Joseph Morelle

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the insurance law, in relation to pre-existing condition provisions for group and blanket disability policies

Purpose or general idea of bill

This bill would amend §3234 of the insurance law to require disability income insurers to make available to employers who purchase group or blanket disability insurance the option of a contract with a pre-existing condition exclusion provision. This bill would require insurers to offer employers a group disability contract with a provision that establishes that a pre-existing condition that occurs prior to an employee's effective date of coverage, and results in the disability of that employee within the first twelve months after the effective date of coverage, would be excluded from coverage. Insurers would also be required to offer to employers a contract that would limit but not exclude disability coverage for pre-existing conditions. Employers could choose which of these options they want in their contract.

Summary of provisions

Section 1 of the bill amends §3234 of the insurance law by adding a new subsection (b) to require that insurers must make available to employers a pre-existing condition exclusion provision in all group and blanket disability contracts being offered. Such exclusion would provide that a pre-existing condition that occurs prior to an employee's effective date of coverage, and results in the disability of that employee within the first twelve months after the effective date of coverage, would be excluded from coverage for loss of income. Section 1 also re-letters current subsection (b) as new subsection (c) and makes conforming changes to the new subsection.

Justification

Due to a recent Court of Appeals decision (Benesowitz v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, 8 NY3d 661 2007 ) which reinterpreted §3234 (a) (2) of the insurance law, insurers and businesses in New York were required to revise what was previously considered to be a preexisting condition exclusion provision in group disability income insurance contracts and instead apply it as a limitation on coverage only for up to twelve months following the employee's effective date of coverage. As a result, employees who become disabled due to a pre-existing condition are no longer excluded from coverage for the life of that claim. This decision permits some seriously ill employees to obtain coverage and then almost immediately file a claim and will result, in some cases, in an increase in the premiums charged for group disability income policies in New York. These increased rates would be for a type of coverage that can already be quite costly for businesses/employees to afford and any increase in rates might preclude this coverage from being purchased or continued altogether.

Giving employers the choice of which option to purchase will result in more New Yorkers being offered disability coverage. Those companies that can afford the more expensive benefit could elect to provide that, whereas those who cannot can purchase the contract with the less expensive benefit option.

Prior legislative history

S.7470 (2008)

Fiscal implications

No known costs to the State are associated with this bill.

Effective date

This act shall take effect immediately.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.