What's happening
Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.
Why it matters
Albany, before your first meeting.
Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.
Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.
Who cares
Headline styles
Sponsors
History
- Referred to labor
- Referred to labor
Companion bill
The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.
Enacts the "Omnibus Prevailing Wage Enforcement Act"
In Assembly Committee · Labor · Sponsor Susan John
Full text
The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.
Sponsor's memo
Title of bill
An act to amend the labor law, the general municipal law and the public officers law, in relation to the omnibus prevailing wage enforcement act and to amend chapter 511 of the laws of 1995, relating to establishing a public work enforcement fund and making an appropriation therefor, in relation to moneys accumulated in the public work enforcement fund
Purpose or general idea of bill
To enact the "Omnibus Prevailing Wage Enforcement Act."
Summary of specific provisions
Section one of the bill contains its title, "Omnibus Prevailing Wage Enforcement Act."
Read the full memo (694 words)
Part A creates the office of the Prevailing Wage Fraud Inspector General for increased vigilance in the effort to achieve prevailing wage enforcement.
Part B of the bill amends section two of chapter 511 of the laws of 1995 to remove the cap on accumulations of money in the Public Work Enforcement Fund and to establish a maintenance of effort in enforcement activity.
Part C calls for verification of the intent to pay prevailing wage where there is a 10%; difference between the lowest and next lowest bid for the construction of public work projects.
Part D of the bill calls for a daily head count of workers at prevailing wage projects.
Part E would allow public authorities to require that successful bidders for public work jobs participate in a state sponsored apprenticeship program.
Part F would prohibit contractors who had been convicted of a felony with respect to a public work project with the state, a municipal corporation, public benefit corporation or public body from participation in public works contracts for five years.
Part G would enable the public to view wage information submitted by contractors participating in public works projects.
Part H of the bill would require a summary transcript, containing classification and payroll information, to be submitted upon completion of a public works project.
Part I would require that the Department of Jurisdiction notify the Department of Labor of projects costing over $1M so that the Department could make appropriate arrangements for audits of the project's compliance with the prevailing wage law. The last sections of the bill contain a severability clause and the effective date information.
Effects of present law which this bill would alter
Present law does not fully provide for the enforcement of the prevailing wage statutes.
Justification
Given the many complaints received, over many years, by the Labor Committee and members of the legislature concerning problems with prevailing wage enforcement, a comprehensive approach to enforcement of the prevailing wage is needed. This bill is comprised of three new legislative proposals and six bills vetoed by the Executive which concern enforcement of the prevailing wage law. The three new proposals are for the creation of an office of the Prevailing Wage Fraud Inspector General, removing the limit on collections from the sub-assessment for Prevailing Wage Enforcement Fund and for mandatory audits of projects over $1M. The establishment of a Prevailing Wage Fraud Inspector General would result in increased scrutiny of the process and greater compliance with the law. Removing the cap on collections through the existing sub-allocation on prevailing wage projects would generate much needed revenue for enforcement. Mandatory audits to be determined on a schedule worked out by the Department of Labor and contracting entity would ensure that audits are done on other than a complaint driven basis.
Prior legislative history
A2853 of 2007-08: referred to Labor S2252 of 2005-06: referred to Labor S4486 of 2003-04: referred to Labor S5504 of 2001-02: referred to Labor A.7981/S.8111: Veto 53 of the Laws of 2000 (Part C) A.11275/S.6935: Veto 50 of the Laws of 2000 (Part D) A.11358/S.8192: Veto 72 of the Laws of 2000 (Part E) A.7979/S.1370-A: Veto 19 of the Laws of 1999 (Part F) A.6923-A/S.4468: Veto 21 of the Laws of 1999 (Part G) A.5153-A/S.5735-A: Veto 19 of the Laws of 1999 (Part H) Part A, B and I are new proposals.
Fiscal implications for state and local government
Would result in increased enforcement and penalty collection and additional revenue due to the proper payment of wages.
Effective date
Immediately, with provisions.
Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.