Skip to content
S5890Senate2009-2010 SessionSame asA9004

Enacts the broadcast employees' freedom to work act; repealer

Sponsor Thomas K. DuaneSD-29Affects Economy
Status
In Senate Committee
Labor
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Labor

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Thomas K. Duane

Senator · Senate District 29

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Referred to labor
  2. Referred to rules

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A9004Assembly

Enacts the broadcast employees' freedom to work act; repealer

In Assembly Committee · Labor · Sponsor Susan John

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the labor law, in relation to enacting the broadcast employees' freedom to work act; and to repeal certain provisions of such law relating thereto

Purpose or general idea of bill

To clarify the protections of persons employed in the broadcast industry.

Summary of specific provisions

Section 1 provides that this act shall be known and may be cited as the "broadcast employees' freedom to work act".

Section 2 repeals section 202-k of the Labor Law and adds a new section 202-k. This new section clarifies the definitions of "broadcasting industry employer" and "broadcast employee" while adding the clarifying definitions of the following terms and phrases: "covered broadcasting services", "management employee", "require as a condition of employment", and "covenant not to compete". Under this section, an entity considered to provide covered broadcasting services must have at least 30 percent of its assets or employees dedicated primarily to such services. This section also clarifies that covenants not to compete applicable during the course of employment are not prohibited. Section one also provides exclusions to prohibited covenants not to compete including (a) enforcement during the remaining term of employment as set forth in the employment agreement, in the event of employment termination; (b) enforcement of a covenant agreed to by a broadcast employee in return for additional and independent consideration; (c) enforcement of an exclusive good-faith negotiation provision; (d) enforcement of a right of first refusal; (e) enforcement of any post contractual restriction for a broadcast employee earning more than one hundred thousand dollars annually; or (f) the enforcement by a broadcasting industry employer of any post-contractual confidentiality or non-disclosure provision. Finally, the section prohibits the waiver of any protection provided by the new section 202-k.

Effects of present law which this bill would alter

Section 202-k of the Labor Law prohibits as a condition of employment, whether in an employment contract or otherwise, that a broadcast employee or prospective broadcast employee refrain from obtaining employment (a) in any specified geographic area; (b) for a specific period of time; or (c) with a particular employer or in any particular industry after the conclusion of employment. This section also provides civil liability for violations of these protections.

Justification

Section 202-k of the Labor Law was intended to protect broadcast employees by prohibiting, as a condition of employment, covenants not to compete. The protections provided by this section are, however, overly broad and unintentionally capture a number of items and situations including, among others, post-contractual confidentiality or non-disclosure provisions and accepting non-compete convenants in return for additional independent consideration. The bill provides these exceptions and thus offers additional freedom and flexibility for broadcast employees and reasonable protections for broadcast employers relating to potentially sensitive confidential information respectively. PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY :

New Bill.

Fiscal implications for state and local governments

None to the state.

Effective date

Immediately.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.