Skip to content
S6144Senate2009-2010 SessionSame asA9195

Limits a school district contingency budget to the lowest proposed defeated budget for the applicable school year

Sponsor Jeffrey D. KleinSD-34Affects Education
Status
In Senate Committee
Education
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Education

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Jeffrey D. Klein

Senator · Senate District 34

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Referred to education
  2. Referred to rules

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A9195Assembly

Limits a school district contingency budget to the lowest proposed defeated budget for the applicable school year

In Assembly Committee · Education · Sponsor Steven Englebright

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the education law, in relation to limiting the contingency budget of a school district

Purpose or general idea of bill

This legislation would prevent school districts from proposing a contingency budget that is greater than the lowest proposed budget defeated by the voters of that district.

Summary of specific provisions

The bill amends subsection 4a of section 2023 of the Education Law, adding a new criterion for school districts to follow when proposing a contingency budget.

Justification

Every year, school districts across the state (with the exception of large city and special act school districts) put forth budgets for voter approval for the following school year. Should a proposed budget be rejected by voters, the school district may put forth a second budget for voter approval or adopt a contingency budget not subject to voter approval. A district whose second proposed budget is rejected also revert to a contingency budget.

Section 2023 of the Education Law requires that contingency budgets conform to certain limitations. Among those limitations are that any spending increase under a contingency budget not exceed the lesser of 4% or the Consumer Price Index x 120 percent. Despite these limitations, it is unclear whether a school district could propose a contingency budget that is greater than a proposed budget rejected by the voters. This situation appeared to be developing in the Schenectady school district during the 2009 school budget voting process, but was averted after a canvas of the voting machines revealed a narrow victory on the second school budget vote by the district's voters.

This bill will prevent situations like the one in Schenectady from arising again by clarifying that a contingency budget can't be greater than the lowest school budget proposed by the district and defeated by the voters.

Prior legislative history

None.

Fiscal implications

None.

Effective date

Immediately.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.