Skip to content
S75Senate2009-2010 SessionSame asA6146

Relates to provisions of orders of protection

Sponsor Dale M. VolkerSD-59Affects Health
Status
In Senate Committee
Children And Families
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Children And Families

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Dale M. Volker

Senator · Senate District 59

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Committee discharged and committed to children and families
  2. Referred to social services, children and families
  3. Referred to children and families
  4. Referred to social services, children and families

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A6146Assembly

Relates to provisions of orders of protection

In Assembly Committee · Judiciary · Sponsor Joseph Errigo

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the family court act, in relation to orders of protection in abuse and neglect cases

Purpose

This legislation seeks to grant family court judges the discretion to require a respondent and his or her parent(s) to participate in family counseling if such counseling is in the best interests of the child.

Summary of provisions

Section 1056 of the Family Court Act is amended by adding a new Subdivision (g) to enable the court to require a respondent and his/her parents "to participate in family counseling or other professional counseling activities conducted by an authorized person or an authorized agency to which the child has been referred or placed. provided that such family counseling or other type of counseling is not contrary to such person's religious beliefs and is deemed to be in the best interest of the child."

Existing law

Current law provides that courts may order respondents to stay away from the home, school, business or place of employment of the other spouse and to refrain from committing further acts that endanger the health and/or welfare of the child. The court may order either parent to provide for expenses incurred for medical care and treatment arising from the incident or incidents forming the basis for the issuance of the order. Finally, the court may impose other conditions as are necessary to further the purposes of protecting the child.

Justification

Under current law, parents who have neglected or abused their children have little or no motivation to cooperate with appropriate treatment or counseling programs. By giving judges the option of directing such cooperation and participation in family counseling programs, the court could exercise additional supervision. The penalties for violating such an order of protection would provide the incentive needed for cooperation and an ultimately positive outcome.

Legislative history

2007-08: S.2712/A.4899. 2006: S.6992/A.10351. 2005: A.5120. 2004: A.2200. 2001: A.3290. 2000: A.3966. 1998: A.9644.

Fiscal implications

None.

Effective date

Immediately.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.