Skip to content
S7640Senate2009-2010 SessionSame asA10481

Relates to the redomestication of insurance companies

Sponsor Neil D. BreslinSD-46Affects Finance
Status
In Senate Committee
Insurance
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Insurance

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Neil D. Breslin

Senator · Senate District 46

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Referred to insurance

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A10481Assembly

Relates to the redomestication of insurance companies

In Assembly Committee · Insurance · Sponsor Jonathan Bing

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the insurance law, in relation to the redomestication of insurance companies

Purpose

To provide for the more efficient regulation of insurance entities by more closely conforming New York law governing the redomestication of insurance companies to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) Redomestication Model Bill.

Summary of provisions

This bill would amend §7120 to the Insurance Law to more closely conform New York law governing the redomestication of insurance companies to the NAIC Redomestication Model Bill. Specifically, this bill would include provisions governing the redomestication of a domestic insurance company to another state upon the approval of the Superintendent of Insurance. In order to be eligible for redomestication, the insurer would have to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Superintendent that the redomestication would further the regulatory efficiency of the holding company system which controls the insurer. The redomesticating insurer would also be required to demonstrate that, upon redomestication, it will be in compliance with all applicable requirements of the Insurance Law. In addition, the redomesticating insurer would be required to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Superintendent that the redomestication will not result in a reduction in the number of employees employed by the company in New York State or a reduction in the number of offices or facilities located in New York State.

Read the full memo (783 words)

Upon redomestication, the transferring company would be authorized to transact business in New York State as a foreign company, provided that the insurer meets all of the requirements for operation as a foreign company.

Justification

This bill will improve the efficiency of the regulation and oversight of affiliated groups of insurance companies domiciled in multiple states and will help to preserve the continuation of state regulation of insurance. The need for this bill became apparent as insurance regulators in various states attempted to sort out the problems resulting from the downfall of AIG. Due to the complexity of AIG's corporate structure and the fact that AIG had affiliated insurance companies domiciled in nineteen different states, the NAIC had to form a task force of insurance commissioners from nineteen states to effectively monitor AIG's financial condition. This cumbersome arrangement made it difficult to unravel the problems resulting from the downfall of AIG and ensure appropriate regulation of AIG's insurance entities going forward.

The AIG experience led state regulators to examine the corporate structures of insurance companies within their jurisdictions and they have found that other insurance companies have similarly complex corporate structures. Some large insurance companies have subsidiaries domiciled in multiple states because as they have grown, they have acquired subsidiaries domiciled in different states. Accordingly, some insurance regulators have urged insurers to simplify their corporate structures so as to increase regulatory effectiveness and efficiency. The Massachusetts Insurance Commissioner, in particular, has urged holding companies domiciled in Massachusetts to endeavor to reduce the complexity of their corporate structures by reducing the number of states in which subsidiaries are domiciled.

Forty-one states have adopted a version of the NAIC Redomestication Model Bill, which provides for a redomestication process which is efficient, effective and not unduly cumbersome. Unfortunately, however, New York State has not adopted this law and under current New York law, the redomestication process is a very difficult, time consuming, confusing and cumbersome process. Accordingly, insurers seeking to comply with the wishes of their home state regulator to simplify their corporate structure have run into a roadblock if they have a subsidiary domiciled in New York. This bill would remove this roadblock by enacting substantial parts of the NAIC Redomestication Model Bill in New York.

By adopting substantial parts of the NAIC Redomestication Model Bill, this legislation will also further uniformity among states relative to the regulation of insurance companies and would make the current state based system for the regulation of insurance companies more efficient. As the threat of the federal regulation of the insurance industry continues to loom, it is important that. states demonstrate their ability to work together and adopt uniform laws where such laws would provide for the more effective regulation of insurance companies. The enactment of this legislation would further this goal.

It is important to note that this bill would only allow an insurance company to redomesticate if the company demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Superintendent of Insurance that the redomestication will increase regulatory efficiency and will not result in a loss of jobs in New York state or a closure of New York offices or facilities, thereby ensuring that this legislation will not have a negative impact on employment in New York State.

Legislative history

New Bill.

Fiscal implications

None.

Effective date

Immediately.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.