What's happening
Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.
Why it matters
Albany, before your first meeting.
Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.
Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.
Who cares
Headline styles
Sponsors
No co-sponsors yet.
History
- Referred to ways and means
- Delivered to assembly
- Passed senateVote 37–18
- Ordered to third reading cal.1199
- Committee discharged and committed to rules
- Print number 7687b
- Amend and recommit to energy and telecommunications
- Print number 7687a
- Amend and recommit to energy and telecommunications
- Referred to energy and telecommunications
Full text
The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.
Sponsor's memo
BILL NUMBER:S7687B
Title of bill
An act to amend the public service law, in relation to utility intervenor reimbursement
Subject and purpose
The purpose of this bill is to establish procedural and substantive criteria for intervenor reimbursement to a participant for its reasonable costs of participation in certain proceedings before the Public Service Commission (PSC).
Read the full memo (732 words)
Summary and description of provisions
This bill would permit groups of individuals or not-for-profit organizations that represent residential or small business customers to apply for reimbursement of its costs for reasonable advocate's fees, reasonable expert witness fees, and other reasonable costs in a proceeding before the Public Service Commission (PSC). The PSC would he authorized to determine appropriate application procedures. This legislation would also provide for compensation to be awarded in advance if the participant makes a showing of significant financial hardship.
Section 1 of this legislation would establish definitions for "compensation," "participant," "commission," "other reasonable costs," "party," "proceeding," "significant financial hardship," "small business," and "substantial contribution."
Section 2 of this legislation would establish requirements that participants would need to include in its application to be submitted to the Department. This section would require a statement of planned participation; description of anticipated advocate's fees, expert fees and other costs; and, any other material required by the Department. If participation would impose significant financial hardship on the applicant, evidence of such hardship must also be submitted.
Section 3 of this legislation would require the Department, within thirty days after the application has been filed, to issue a decision that determines if the participant has made a substantial contribution to its final decision. If the participant included evidence of substantial financial hardship, the Department would determine whether such showing was made and the amount of compensation to be paid by the public utility or utilities prior to the end of the proceeding. This section would authorize the Department to recover any advance payments made if the participant discontinues its participation without the Department's consent. This section would establish the criteria in which compensation is calculated and would require any unused compensation to be returned to the public utility or utilities. This section would authorize the
Department to audit the records and hooks of a participant that would claim significant financial hardship. This section would also authorize the Department to require participants to join their claims if they have substantially similar interests.
Section 4 of this legislation would require a public utility or utilities subject to the proceeding to remit any compensation within thirty days of the proceeding. The Department would then remit such compensation to the participant.
Section 5 of this legislation would authorize the Department to deny any compensation to any participant who attempts to delay or obstruct the proceeding.
Justification
The intent of this legislation is to recognize and remedy the fact that individual action by residential consumers and small businesses for the purposes of participating in utility matters and communicating their views is rendered impracticable by reason of the disproportionate expense of taking such action.
PSC proceedings are offered in a way that minimizes public participation. It is incredibly difficult for typical New Yorkers to remain on top of the goings-on of the PSC. The Commission's usual meeting time is 10:30 a.m., a time when the average citizen or small business owner is not likely to participate. In many instances, the only people who can attend on a regular basis are most likely those whose job depends on it, such as representatives of the utilities and other special interests.
The legislation recognizes that citizen participation should be encouraged when government regulators set policy. Individuals who seek to participate in Public Service Commission (PSC) utility proceedings are referred to as intervenors. Increased public participation through the through the intervenor process, if sought and not fought, will spur a more open and accountable government regulatory process that may yield creative socially responsible solutions to difficult issues. This legislation will provide a mechanism to allow residential and small business utility customers to access financial resources to become active participants in PSC proceedings. This includes the ability to receive compensation of advocate fees, expert witness fees, and other reasonable costs associated with their participation.
Legislative history
2009: A.8722 (Cahill) - Referred to Energy
Fiscal implications
None to the State. Intervenor fees would be provided by utilities.
Effective date
This legislation would be effective thirty days after being signed into law.
Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.