Skip to content
S7692Senate2009-2010 Session

Establishes a new element for professional misconduct for providing expert witness testimony without reasonable medical foundation

Sponsor Pedro Espada Jr.SD-33Affects Education
Status
In Senate Committee
Higher Education
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Higher Education

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Pedro Espada Jr.

Senator · Senate District 33

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Referred to higher education

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the education law, in relation to establishing a new element for professional misconduct for providing expert witness testimony that is false or without reasonable medical foundation

Purpose

The purpose of the bill is to ensure expert witness testimony is true and with reasonable medical foundation by accepted peer-reviewed science-based medical research.

Summary of provisions

Section 1. Section 6530 of the education law is amended by adding a new subdivision 50 that creates a new element of professional misconduct for providing medical expert witness testimony that is without reasonable medical foundation. Section 2. Establish an effective date of ninety days from when the bill is signed into law.

Justification

Many verdicts regarding medical malpractice in the United States are made by judges or juries. Because most jurors are not educated in medicine, courts depend on expert witnesses to help them understand and decide complex cases. To protect the rights of injured patients and innocent physicians, and to uphold legitimate standards of medical care, it is legally appropriate for persons with sufficient expertise to testify in medical malpractice cases.

As an expert witness, the individual has a responsibility to be objective, truthful, and impartial when evaluating a case and to use knowledge on the basis of generally accepted standards of clinical practice. This legislation will establish a new element for professional misconduct if an expert overstates or misrepresents his or her opinion or credentials or offers false testimony.

Legislative history

New bill.

Fiscal implications

NONE.

Effective date

This act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it shall have become a law.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.