Skip to content
S800Senate2009-2010 SessionSame asA2369

Prohibits any agreement relating to the construction, alteration, repair or maintenance of a building requiring subcontractors and materialmen to exhaust remedies

Sponsor Neil D. BreslinSD-46+5 co-sponsorsAffects Legal
Status
Senate Floor Calendar
Impact
Pending
Outcome
Companion signed

Bill progress

Signed via A2369

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

History

  1. Substituted by A2369
  2. Advanced to third reading
  3. 2nd report cal.
  4. 1st report cal.353
  5. Referred to judiciary

Companion bill

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the general obligations law, in relation to a subcontractor's or materialman's right to file a claim and/or commence an action upon a payment bond

Purpose or general idea of bill

To forbid agreements in construction contracts to condition subcontractor's and materialman's rights to file a claim and/or commence an action on a payment bond on exhaustion of another legal remedy.

Summary of specific provisions

Section 5-322.1 of the General Obligations Law is amended to declare void and unenforceable a construction contract provision conditioning a subcontractor's and materialman's right to file claim and/or commence an action on payment bond on exhaustion of another legal remedy.

Justification

Since the New York State Court of Appeals West-Fair case which placed the risk of non payment by the owner on the contractor, contractors and their attorneys have been attempting to circumvent that decision and place the risk for non payment on the subcontractor. This "conditional provision" in effect denies the subcontractor and materialman its right to timely file and commence an action on the payment bond. Waiting until such time, as the subcontractor or materialman has exhausted its lien remedies or other legal remedies, will in all likelihood cause the one year statute of limitations for commencing an action on the bond to expire, thus resulting in shifting the risk of non payment from the bonding company and the contractor to the subcontractor and materialman. The intent of such a conditional provision is to interfere with the subcontractor and materialman's 3rd party beneficiary rights under the payment bond. Clearly such a provision is against public policy and should be declared void and unenforceable.

Prior legislative history

2008: A.9638 Passed Assembly

Fiscal implications

None.

Effective date

This act shall take effect immediately.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.