What's happening
Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.
Why it matters
Albany, before your first meeting.
Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.
Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.
Who cares
Headline styles
Sponsors
No co-sponsors yet.
History
- Referred to labor
Companion bill
The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.
Relates to reciprocity of debarments imposed under the federal Davis-Bacon act
In Assembly Committee · Labor · Sponsor Charles Lavine
Full text
The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.
Sponsor's memo
BILL NUMBER:S8064
Title of bill
An act to amend the labor law, in relation to reciprocity of debarments imposed under the federal Davis-Bacon Act
Purpose
The purpose of the bill is to close a loophole in the existing law relating to the debarment of contractors. Under the current law, contractors who have been debarred from federal job sites for having violated the wage-and-hour provisions of the Davis-Bacon Act are under no such disability in New York, Federally debarred contractors are on an equal footing with honest, law-abiding contractors in that they are eligible and authorized to bid on and be awarded construction contracts sponsored by the State of New York and its political subdivisions. This bill would remedy that inequity by granting reciprocity to debarments imposed by the federal government on contractors who have violated the Davis-Bacon Act.
Read the full memo (908 words)
Summary of provisions
The bill provides that any contractor who has been debarred from federal job sites for having disregarded obligations to employees under the Davis-Bacon Act shall also be debarred under the Labor Law from bidding on or being awarded similar contracts on public work job sites sponsored by the State or any of its political subdivisions.
Justification
Under Article 8 of the Labor Law, contractors or subcontractors who engage in a public work project sponsored by the State of New York or any of its political subdivisions is required to pay their laborers, workers and material men not less than the prevailing rate of wage. This law has a long and venerable history. New York passed its wages- and-hours law in 1894 in response to abuses that emerged during the industrial revolution, when entire families were forced to work long hours under dangerous working conditions for subsistence wages. The rationale behind the law was that American labor markets should provide skilled workers with decent wages so that workers would be able to support their families and their children would be able to pursue an education.
In recent years, New York's prevailing wage law has acquired additional stature as a bulwark against wages-and-hours fraud. Recent studies indi- cate that fraud in the construction industry in New York State has reached epidemic proportions. Dishonest contractors, in an effort to cut corners and save on labor costs, have engaged in a number of schemes to avoid paying workers the wage to which they are statutorily entitled. They include the kickback of wages, dual payrolls and cash-off-the-books schemes.
The practice of paying wages in the form of cash-off-the-books has come to be known as "the underground economy," and it has deleterious and
far-reaching consequences for the individual workers, reputable contrac- tors and society as a whole. Analysts report that one of the most invi- dious effects is that it has a profoundly destabilizing effect on labor markets by destroying the level playing field. Honest employers, who are incurring significant additional operating expenses in the form of unem- ployment insurance tax, administrative costs for the collection of with holding taxes and the high premiums associated with workers compensation insurance are unable to compete for work with their dishonest counter- parts.
Mindful of the crisis in the construction industry, in 2008 the legisla- ture passed, and the governor signed into law, a far-reaching amendment that significantly expanded the criminal penalties for willful violations of the prevailing wage law. (Chapters 7 and 8, L. 2008). But the first line of defense in protecting both workers and honest employ- ers are the debarment provisions set forth in Labor Law
§ 220-b. Under the existing law, a contractor may be debarred from participation in public work projects if the Bureau of Public Works finds that the contractor has knowingly committed two violations of the prevailing wage law within a six-year period, or one violation relating to the falsification of payroll records or the kickback of wages or supplements. Debarments are also imposed when a person or corporation, or any officer or shareholder who owns or controls at least ten percent of the outstanding stock of such corporation has been convicted of any of an enumerated list of felonies for conduct relating to obtaining, performing or attempting to perform a public work contract with the state, any municipal corporation, public benefit corporation or public body (q.v., Labor Law §220-b 3b(2)(ii)).
Its federal counterpart, the Davis-Bacon Act, imposes a similar penalty on contractors who are found to have disregarded their obligations to employees under federal wage-and-hour laws. At the present time, howev- er, New York Labor Law fails to recognize debarments imposed by the United. States Department of Labor under the Davis-Bacon Act. Hence, contractors who have been debarred by the federal government for wage- and-hour violations are permitted to bid on and be awarded public work contracts or subcontracts offered through the State of New York and its political subdivisions.
Working at a public work job site is a privilege, not a right. New York- ers are entitled to expect the highest standard of integrity from contractors who bid on these projects. It is inequitable to allow previ- ously debarred contractors - contractors who have a proven track record of dishonesty - to compete against honest contractors in the bidding process. By strengthening the debarment provisions, this amendment should help to ensure that honest employers and their workers will have an equal opportunity to compete at public work job sites.
Legislative history
New Bill.
Fiscal impact on the state
None.
Effective date
This act shall take effect immediately.
Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.