Skip to content
S892Senate2009-2010 Session

Limits the definition of "income" in computing rental surcharges levied against tenants of a limited-profit housing company

Sponsor Carl KrugerSD-27Affects Housing
Status
In Senate Committee
Housing, Construction And Community Development
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Housing, Construction And Community Development

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Carl Kruger

Senator · Senate District 27

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Referred to housing, construction and community development
  2. Referred to housing, construction and community development

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the private housing finance law, in relation to computation of the rental surcharge paid by tenants of limited-profit housing companies

Summary

This bill would amend subdivision 3 of Section 31 of the Private Housing Finance Law by adding a provision to the "surcharge clause" stating that the definition of income used for computing the surcharge for 1974 and after be the definition of income in subdivision 29 of Section 2 of this chapter. It is further stated that for the 1974 surcharge for 1973 income, based on the new definition as intended by the law, be used. If the amount of the rental surcharge previously levied exceeds the surcharge as recomputed, the difference will be reimbursed to the tenant.

Justification

The New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development by arbitrary administrative decision in implementing L. 1974, Ch. 728 which changed the definition of income, charged residents of city supervised Mitchell-Lama higher surcharges than similarly-situated residents of City-supervised housing. The State Division of Housing and Community Renewal has refused to give administrative relief in this matter, and statutory enactment is thus sought.

Fiscal implications

Minor revenue loss to New York City.

Effective date

This act shall take effect immediately.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.