Skip to content
S3246Senate2011-2012 SessionSame asA5194

Relates to the projection of increases in school enrollment

Sponsor Hugh T. FarleySD-44Affects Education
Status
In Senate Committee
Education
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Education

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Hugh T. Farley

Senator · Senate District 44

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Referred to education
  2. Referred to education

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A5194Assembly

Relates to the projection of increases in school enrollment

In Assembly Committee · Education · Sponsor George Amedore

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

BILL NUMBER:S3246

Title of bill

An act to amend the education law, in relation to the projection of increases in school enrollment

Purpose or general idea of bill

This bill would require school districts, when projecting enrollment increases under a contingency budget, to use the lesser of an increase in enrollment from the prior year or the lowest estimated increase in enrollment used to determine a school budget prepared for the year that was rejected by the voters of the school district.

Summary of specific provisions

Section 1 adds language to Subparagraph (v) of paragraph b of Subdivision 4 of Section 2023 of the Education Law to require school districts to use the lesser of an increase in enrollment from the prior year or the lowest estimated increase in enrollment used to determine a school budget prepared for the year that was rejected by the voters of the school district.

Section 2 provides the effective date.

Justification

School districts throughout the State have threatened school district voters prior to a school district vote that a contingency budget will be higher than the original proposed budget. This is due mainly to statutory budget exclusions that have been enacted to accompany the contingency cap.

Specifically, there have been occasions where school districts have adjusted their original proposed budget projections under a contingency budget cap and allowed the school district to increase their contingency budget above the original proposed budget and the statutory contingency cap. This bill will require school districts to use the lesser of an increase in enrollment from the prior year or the lowest estimated increase in enrollment used to determine a school budget prepared for the year that was rejected by the voters of the school district.

Prior legislative history

2009-10: A.9993/S.7097, Education

Fiscal implications

To be determined.

Effective date

The act shall take effect on the first of July next succeeding the date on which it shall become a law.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.