Skip to content
S3450Senate2011-2012 SessionSame asA7000

Requires at least one supreme court justice to be assigned to hold court in each county in a judicial district

Sponsor Joseph A. GriffoSD-47Affects Legal
Status
In Senate Committee
Judiciary
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Judiciary

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Joseph A. Griffo

Senator · Senate District 47

Chair, Banks

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Referred to judiciary
  2. Referred to judiciary

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A7000Assembly

Requires at least one supreme court justice to be assigned to hold court in each county in a judicial district

In Assembly Committee · Judiciary · Sponsor Addie Jenne

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

BILL NUMBER:S3450

Title of bill

An act to amend the judiciary law, in relation to requiring the designation and assignment of not less than one supreme court justice to hold court in the county seat of each county within the judicial district

Purpose

To provide that a supreme court judge holds court at the county seat of each county in the judicial district.

Summary of provisions

Amends the judiciary law by adding that the justices of the appellate division shall assign at least one supreme court justice to hold court at the county seat of each of the counties in the judicial district.

Justification

This legislation would provide that smaller populated counties within a judicial district are provided fair access to judicial court proceedings.

Many of the larger counties within a judicial district have increasingly elected Judges from their counties thus preventing equal access to court proceedings for people living in less populated counties. This bill would ensure less populated counties will have access to Supreme Court proceedings within their own county regardless of where the Supreme Court Justice resides.

Legislative history

This is a new bill.

Fiscal implications

To be determined.

Effective date

This act shall take effect on the sixtieth day after it shall have become a law.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.