What's happening
Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.
Why it matters
Albany, before your first meeting.
Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.
Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.
Who cares
Headline styles
Sponsors
3 Co-sponsors
History
- Substituted by A668
- Advanced to third reading
- 2nd report cal.
- 1st report cal.345
- Referred to environmental conservation
Companion bill
The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.
Relates to mercury-added consumer products; repealer
Signed by Governor · Sponsor Ellen C. Jaffee
Full text
The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.
Sponsor's memo
BILL NUMBER:S3888
Title of bill
An act to amend the environmental conservation law, in relation to mercury-added consumer products
Purpose or general idea of bill
The purpose of this bill is to provide a technical amendment to the law restricting the sale of certain mercury-added products.
Summary of specific provisions
This bill would:
* remove, beginning January 1, 2012, the requirement that the Commissioner of the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) make an affirmative finding that there are non-mercury alternative products prior to prohibiting the sale of mercury containing sphygmomanometers, relays, flame sensors and thermostats;
* authorize DEC to grant a waiver upon request by the manufacturer and information demonstrating:
* there are no non-mercury alternatives comparable in price, effect or accuracy; or,
* the use of mercury-added products provides a net benefit to the environment, public health, or public safety;
* there are other factors affecting the use of non-mercury alternatives; and
* permit DEC to grant waivers and renewals for a renewals for a period not to exceed two years.
JUSTIFICATION:; The law enacted in 2004 authorized a ban of certain mercury-containing products upon a finding by the Department that there were mercury-free alternatives. At a hearing held by the Assembly Environmental Conservation Committee in 2009, the Department testified that they were unable to make such a finding because of the myriad of products available. Other states, including Maine and Wisconsin, have adopted bans without requiring such an affirmative finding. This legislation follows those models and better reflects the intent of the 2004 legislation.
This bill would protect the environment and public health by prohibiting the sale of certain products that contain mercury, and ensuring that such products are properly disposed of when they are no longer in service.
Prior legislative history
2010: A.11145 (Jaffee) - Referred to Environmental Conservation Committee.
Fiscal implications
None to the state.
Effective date
This act shall take effect immediately. However, any written findings of the Commissioner of Environmental Conservation shall remain in full force and effect until January 1, 2012.
Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.