Skip to content
S3888Senate2011-2012 SessionSame asA668

Relates to mercury-added consumer products; repealer

Sponsor Mark GrisantiSD-60+3 co-sponsorsAffects Environment & Energy
Status
Senate Floor Calendar
Impact
Pending
Outcome
Companion signed

Bill progress

Signed via A668

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Mark Grisanti

Senator · Senate District 60

Chair, Environmental Conservation

History

  1. Substituted by A668
  2. Advanced to third reading
  3. 2nd report cal.
  4. 1st report cal.345
  5. Referred to environmental conservation

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A668Assembly

Relates to mercury-added consumer products; repealer

Signed by Governor · Sponsor Ellen C. Jaffee

Signed into law

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

BILL NUMBER:S3888

Title of bill

An act to amend the environmental conservation law, in relation to mercury-added consumer products

Purpose or general idea of bill

The purpose of this bill is to provide a technical amendment to the law restricting the sale of certain mercury-added products.

Summary of specific provisions

This bill would:

* remove, beginning January 1, 2012, the requirement that the Commissioner of the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) make an affirmative finding that there are non-mercury alternative products prior to prohibiting the sale of mercury containing sphygmomanometers, relays, flame sensors and thermostats;

* authorize DEC to grant a waiver upon request by the manufacturer and information demonstrating:

* there are no non-mercury alternatives comparable in price, effect or accuracy; or,

* the use of mercury-added products provides a net benefit to the environment, public health, or public safety;

* there are other factors affecting the use of non-mercury alternatives; and

* permit DEC to grant waivers and renewals for a renewals for a period not to exceed two years.

JUSTIFICATION:; The law enacted in 2004 authorized a ban of certain mercury-containing products upon a finding by the Department that there were mercury-free alternatives. At a hearing held by the Assembly Environmental Conservation Committee in 2009, the Department testified that they were unable to make such a finding because of the myriad of products available. Other states, including Maine and Wisconsin, have adopted bans without requiring such an affirmative finding. This legislation follows those models and better reflects the intent of the 2004 legislation.

This bill would protect the environment and public health by prohibiting the sale of certain products that contain mercury, and ensuring that such products are properly disposed of when they are no longer in service.

Prior legislative history

2010: A.11145 (Jaffee) - Referred to Environmental Conservation Committee.

Fiscal implications

None to the state.

Effective date

This act shall take effect immediately. However, any written findings of the Commissioner of Environmental Conservation shall remain in full force and effect until January 1, 2012.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.