Skip to content
S4449Senate2011-2012 SessionSame asA6118

Provides that a public authority or municipality may not provide a tax benefit without declaring a specific listing of the public benefit

Sponsor Michael H. RanzenhoferSD-61Affects Economy
Status
In Senate Committee
Corporations, Authorities And Commissions
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Corporations, Authorities And Commissions

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Michael H. Ranzenhofer

Senator · Senate District 61

Chair, Corporations, Authorities And Commissions

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Referred to corporations, authorities and commissions
  2. Referred to corporations, authorities and commissions

Companion bill

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

BILL NUMBER:S4449

Title of bill

An act to amend the public authorities law, in relation to public benefits in exchange for public funds

Purpose or general idea of the bill

To assure there is a public benefit being achieved when state and local authorities and other governmental entities provide economic or financial benefits to private entities.

Summary of provisions

Amends the Public Authorities Law by adding a new section 2927 which would ban state and local authorities and other governmental entities from issuing, approving or seeking the grant or transfer of economic or financial benefits to a private entity without specific public benefits being published first.

Justification

As taxpayer support for private corporations and private economic activity has mushroomed in recent years, the fundamental question of public benefit has surfaced and resurfaced, without a consistent and satisfying answer. Critics on both the left and right have decried these taxpayer subsidies as socialism, wasteful, corrupt, anti-free enterprise, and unfair to average citizens whose economic struggles are undertaken without public subsidy. Yet the phrases "economic development", 'job creation", "growth", etc. retain enormous political power. A real analysis of these subsidies has yet to be done, but there clearly is growing pressure to insure that public benefits flow from public investments. It is clear, however, that everyone from the most ardent supporter to the most ardent critic of the deal agrees that public subsidies are a decision to employ taxpayer money for the benefit of the public. Without a measurable, identifiable, specific and significant public benefit, public financial assistance should not be given. This bill will protect public funds and ensure that a true public benefit will be achieved when large economic development projects are subsidized by New Yorkers.

Legislative history

A.7659 of 2009-10 - Corporations

Fiscal implications

No negative fiscal implications.

Effective date

Immediately.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.