Skip to content
S4660Senate2011-2012 SessionSame asA3551

Relates to referrals of patients for health related items or services

Sponsor Kemp HannonSD-6+1 co-sponsorAffects Health
Status
Senate Floor Calendar
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Vetoed via A3551

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Kemp Hannon

Senator · Senate District 6

Chair, Health

1 Co-sponsor

History

  1. Substituted by A3551A
  2. Advanced to third reading
  3. 2nd report cal.
  4. 1st report cal.814
  5. Referred to health
  6. Referred to health

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A3551Assembly

Relates to referrals of patients for health related items or services

Vetoed · Sponsor Richard Gottfried

Vetoed

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

BILL NUMBER:S4660

Title of bill

An act to amend the public health law, in relation to referrals of patients for health or health related items or services

Purpose or general idea of bill

To promote conformity between the federal Stark Law and New York's Health Care Practitioner Referrals Statute.

Summary of provisions

Amends Public Health Law §238-a (2) (g) to provide that a referral or arrangement that would be allowed under federal law, 42 D.S.C. 1395nn or its regulations would similarly be allowed under the New York law, unless the Public Health and Health Planning Council declares a type of arrangement to pose a substantial risk of payor or patient abuse, by regulation approved by the Health Commissioner.

Amends the list of exemptions in Public Health Law § 238-a (6) (c) to add any referral or arrangement allowed under federal law, unless the state Public Health and Health Planning Council declares a type of referral to pose a substantial risk of payor or patient abuse, by regulation subject approval of the Health Commissioner.

Justification

This bill is being introduced in order to determine what effect the federal Stark law (named for its congressional sponsor) establishes complex rules on referrals from one health care provider to another and the financial relationships between providers. The purpose is to avoid kickback arrangements and conflicts of interest that cost patients and third-party payers money and can lead to unnecessary and inappropriate services. New York State's law is similar but not the same. So some arrangements or referrals are permissible under the federal Stark law but not under the New York statute. This can create difficulties for health care providers.

For example, the New York statute does not contain exceptions for providing electronic medical record systems, donations of items and services to federally qualified health centers, and fair market value arrangements. Also, the New York exception for in-office ancillary services requires an employer/employee relationship, as compared to the Stark exception, which permits an independent contractor relationship.

The bill would provide that arrangements or referrals that are allowed under the federal law are also allowed under the New York law, unless the Public Health and Health Planning Council and the Health Commissioner designate particular types of arrangements or referrals that would not be allowed because they pose a substantial risk of payor or patient abuse. The bill was drafted in conjunction with the State Bar Association's health law section and has broad provider support.

The bill is being introduced in order to determine what practical effect making NYS' law uniform with the federal Stark law would have on business practices and consumer care.

Prior legislative history

2009-10: A.9933 - Passed Assembly. S.6955/A.9933 of 2010

Fiscal implications

None.

Effective date

Immediately.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.