Skip to content
S4843Senate2011-2012 SessionSame asA8254

Proscribes indemnity agreements in motor carrier transportation contracts

Sponsor George D. MaziarzSD-62+1 co-sponsorAffects Transportation
Status
In Senate Committee
Transportation
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Transportation

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
George D. Maziarz

Senator · Senate District 62

Chair, Energy And Telecommunications

1 Co-sponsor

History

  1. Referred to transportation
  2. Referred to transportation

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A8254Assembly

Proscribes indemnity agreements in motor carrier transportation contracts

In Assembly Committee · Transportation · Sponsor Donna Lupardo

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

BILL NUMBER:S4843

Title of bill

An act to amend the transportation law, in relation to proscribing indemnity agreements in motor carrier transportation contracts

Purpose of general idea of bill

Article 8 of the Transportation Law is amended by adding Section 182, This section will prohibit the use of indemnification clauses in contracts between shippers and common earners.

Summary of specific provisions

Section 182(1)(a) defines "motor carrier transportation contract. Section 182(1)(b) defines "promisee". Section 182(2) makes any contract that purports to indemnify, defend or hold harmless, or has the effect of indemnifying, defending or holding harmless, the promisee from or against any liability for loss or damage resulting from the negligence or intentional acts or omissions of the promisee; is against the public policy of this state and is void and unenforceable.

Justification

Current law does not prohibit a shipper from including indemnification language in the contract between the shipper and motor carrier. The indemnification absolves the shipper of all liability for damage to goods regardless of fault. For example, if a shipment of produce is damaged in the warehouse because it was kept there too long, it is the responsibility of trucking company because of the indemnification provision in the contract.

Because indemnification language is commonly included in contracts,. motor carriers have no choice but to accept the terms. Twenty-five states (thirteen of them in the past two years) have passed similar legislation to address this growing problem.

This legislation will not limit anyone's ability to collect for damaged goods but will simply hold the responsible party liable.

Prior legislative history

None.

Fiscal implications

None.

Effective date

Immediately.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.