Skip to content
S5798Senate2011-2012 Session

Provides for vacating of an arbitration award on the ground that the arbitrator was affiliated with a party, or has a financial interest in a party or the outcome

Sponsor Charles J. Fuschillo Jr.SD-8Affects Legal
Status
In Senate Committee
Judiciary
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Judiciary

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Charles J. Fuschillo Jr.

Senator · Senate District 8

Chair, Transportation

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Referred to judiciary
  2. Referred to rules

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

BILL NUMBER:S5798

Title of bill

An act to amend the civil practice law and rules, in relation to grounds for vacating an arbitration award on the basis of partiality of the arbitrator

Purpose

To clarify the intent and protect the purpose of the existing laws regarding arbitration by creating a definition of the term arbitration.

Summary of provisions

Amends Article 75 Civil Practice Law and Rules by adding a provision to subdivision (b) (ii) of Section 7511 which adds the fact that an arbitrator has been affiliated with any party or has a direct or indirect financial interest in any party or in the outcome of the arbitration, as grounds to vacate an arbitration award.

Existing law

Requires an arbitrator to be neutral.

Justification

The public policy in favor of arbitration which is codified in Section 7501 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, is based upon the fact that arbitration can be a more efficient and cost-effective method for parties to resolve disputes. The presumption that an arbitration clause is enforceable has, however, become a sword to wield against parties of lesser means rather than a shield to protect against unnecessary litigation.

Currently, a party must prove, either during the course of misconduct by the arbitrator or after an award by an arbitrator is perceived to be unfair, that the arbitrator was biased - even if the arbitrator clearly has an economic stake in the outcome of the dispute. This outcome is in direct opposition to the reasons (efficiency and fairness) why arbitration is favored. As arbitration is commonly thought to be a dispute resolution procedure that occurs in front of a neutral third party, codifying it as such will enforce the original intent of the law.

Legislative history

New bill.

Fiscal implications

None.

Local fiscal implications

None.

Effective date

Immediate.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.