Skip to content
S607Senate2011-2012 SessionSame asA3656

Relates to the definition of alternate energy production facilities

Sponsor George D. MaziarzSD-62Affects Environment & Energy
Status
Senate Floor Calendar
Impact
Pending
Outcome
Companion signed

Bill progress

Signed via A3656

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
George D. Maziarz

Senator · Senate District 62

Chair, Energy And Telecommunications

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Substituted by A3656A
  2. Amended on third reading 607b
  3. Advanced to third reading
  4. 2nd report cal.
  5. Amended 607a
  6. 1st report cal.36
  7. Referred to energy and telecommunications

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A3656Assembly

Relates to the definition of alternate energy production facilities

Signed by Governor · Sponsor Kevin Cahill

Signed into law

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

BILL NUMBER:S607B

Title of bill

An act to amend the public service law, in relation to the definition of alternate energy production facilities

Purpose of the bill

This bill would encourage the development of new, clean alternative Electric generation technologies by reducing the regulatory burden on batteries flow batteries and capacitors.

Summary of provisions

Section 1 of the bill would amend Public Service Law (PSL) §2(2-b) would exempt batteries, capacitors and flow batteries with an electric generating capacity of less than 80 MW, from the definition of facilities giving rise to an "electric corporation" subject to the jurisdiction of the Public Service Commission.

Section 2 defines the effective date as the thirtieth day after it shall become law.

Existing law

P8L §2(13) defines electric corporations subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission. Cogeneration facilities (P8L §2(2-a), small hydro facilities (P8L §2(2)-c)), and alternate energy production facilities (P8L §2(2-b) are specifically exempted from the definition of facilities giving rise to an "electric corporation."

P8L §2(2-b) defines an "alternate energy production facility" to include any solar, wind turbine, waste management resource recovery, fuel cell, tidal, wave energy and refuse-derived fuel or wood burning facility with an electric generating capacity of up to 80 MW which produces electricity, gas or useful thermal energy.

Statement in support

Energy storage resources have the potential to offer a number of valuable benefits to the New York electric grid including improving the economic efficiency of the power system and enhanced integration of renewable technologies. Currently, battery and flow battery storage devices are not excluded from the regulatory structure of the commission on new technologies in order to. encourage their development and use in New York State. Yet these battery systems allow for use of electricity generated from renewable Sources or produced during off-peak times to be used during times of higher demand, reducing the need to ramp up more expensive - and potentially more polluting - generating facilities to meet peak demand. Such facilities also provide frequency and voltage regulation support to improve the efficiency of the electric grid and, as noted, reduce the need for traditional generation such as load-following boilers.

These facilities can significantly improve the efficiency, of the State's electric system, allowing for the utilization of clean, renewable resources that might otherwise not be dispatched. Additionally, in May 2009, the New York Battery and Energy Storage

Technology Consortium (NY BEST) was created with the ultimate goal of positioning New York as the global leader in energy storage technology. To support NY BEST the state has set aside $25 million to finance the development of energy storage technologies, including battery testing, in New York. While this investment is significant, and the consortium's mission laudable, we cannot achieve these goals without also batteries, capacitors and flow batteries the same regulatory advantage as-and place them on equal footing with various other alternative production facilities in New York.

Legislative history

S.8310 of 2009-2010

Budget implications

Exemption of these facilities would reduce workload for commission staff.

Effective date

This bill would take effect on the thirtieth day after it shall become law.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.