What's happening
Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.
Why it matters
Albany, before your first meeting.
Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.
Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.
Who cares
Headline styles
Sponsors
1 Co-sponsor
History
- Substituted by A3705
- Advanced to third reading
- 2nd report cal.
- 1st report cal.165
- Referred to racing, gaming and wagering
Companion bill
The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.
Establishes antitrust exemptions for certain horse racing agreements
Vetoed · Sponsor J. Gary Pretlow
Full text
The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.
Sponsor's memo
BILL NUMBER:S623
Title of bill
An act to amend the racing, pari-mutuel wagering and breeding law, in relation to antitrust exemptions for horse racing agreements
Purpose
To permit racetracks and other racing event producers or retailers to band together to establish agreements governing the scheduling of their races and to establish joint agreements involving the sale and purchase of broadcasting and simulcasting rights.
Summary of provisions
Section 1: Adds a new Racing & Wagering Law section 113 to grant antitrust immunity to certain agreements among entities licensed by the Racing & Wagering Board to conduct wagering. These entities would be granted anti-trust immunity to develop agreements which coordinate the dates and times of their races and are also given immunity to enter into contracts involving the joint purchase or sale of their broadcasts, simulcasts, and electronic transmissions. All such agreements must be approved by the Racing & Wagering Board. The standard of review is that such agreements must protect the continued viability of the State's horse racing and agricultural industries.
Existing law
Such agreements may, under current law, violate the State and Federal anti-trust laws.
Justification
Attendance at racetracks and real betting handle in New York has been falling rapidly for the past 40 years. Racetracks need a better way of competing with other gambling and entertainment attractions. This bill allows such racing event producers and retailers to combine forces to make joint arrangements on both the scheduling and the times of their races, or to sell and/or purchase broadcast and simulcast rights. Making such joint cooperative arrangements may lead to better national market penetration of the State's racing products and help to reduce overhead costs and competition among New York's racing producers so that OTB's can effectively market each racetrack's products.
All agreements would need to be approved by the Racing & Wagering Board so that only those agreements that promote the State's legitimate interests in advancing our local horse racing and agricultural industries would be approved. This bill ensures that future joint agreements do not run afoul of the Federal and State anti-trust laws. It is arguable that some joint arrangements between competitive racetracks could pose antitrust questions. The need to preserve the State's ailing racetracks should, however, outweigh any limited anti-competitive effects of any joint marketing or horse race production agreements: The U.S. Supreme Court, under Parker v. Brown, 317 US 341 (1943) grants states the statutory authority to confer immunity for the Sherman Anti-trust Act for certain government sanctioned activities. The second section of this bill is modeled on
15 U.S.C. Section 1291 which grants anti-trust immunity to broadcasts for certain professional leagues.
Legislative history
2010: S.6197 - Referred to Racing, Gaming & Wagering
Fiscal implications
None.
Local fiscal implications
None.
Effective date
Immediate.
Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.