What's happening
Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.
Why it matters
Albany, before your first meeting.
Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.
Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.
Who cares
Headline styles
Sponsors
No co-sponsors yet.
History
- Referred to investigations and government operations
Companion bill
The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.
Provides for an annual increase in the aggregate annual amount of empire state film production credits taken, based upon inflation
In Assembly Committee · Ways And Means · Sponsor Aravella Simotas
Full text
The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.
Sponsor's memo
BILL NUMBER:S7023
Title of bill
An act to amend chapter 60 of the laws of 2004, amending the tax law relating to the empire state film production credit, in relation to the aggregate annual amount of such credit against state taxes
Purpose
Provides for an annual increase in the aggregate annual amount of empire state film production credits taken, based upon inflation
Read the full memo (677 words)
Summary of provisions
Section 1 of the bill amends e of section 7 of part P of chapter 60 of the laws of 2004, amending the tax law relating to the empire state film production credit, as amended by section 1 of part C of chapter 312 of the laws of 2010, to provide for an annual aggregate amount of the Empire State Film Credits that may be taken against state taxes in 2015 and beyond, based on an inflation adjusted calculation of the amount provided in the final funded year of 2014.
Section 2 establishes the effective date.
Justification
The Empire State Film Production Tax Credit has been an unqualified success for the State of New York, both culturally and financially. Despite the fact that New York's tax credit is significantly less gener- ous than the credits offered by competing states (including Connecticut and Massachusetts), it continues to be a premier destination for films and television shows, shining light on the State's rightful status as a world capital for the arts. The tax credit program has also proven to have a consistently beneficial impact on the State's bottom line. In 2009, an Ernst & Young study estimated that the program had cost the state $690 million while generating $2.6 billion in tax revenue. Even more importantly, the program has helped create tens of thousands of new jobs in this state.
While the 2010-2011 state budget extended the program by five years in 2010, it failed to address a major institutional problem which dissuades television shows from setting up roots in the state. Unlike movie productions, television productions are "quasi-permanent" institutions that ordinarily must run for at least four years to reach syndication length and become truly profitable. This means that as soon as the second year of a five-year tax credit extension, television production companies considering putting down roots in the state can no longer be assured that the credit will still be in place when their shows reach sufficient length. Consequently, in order to consistently attract the most promising television series, it is critical that production compa- nies be given the peace of mind that, if their shows are successful, they will not be forced to uproot production and move elsewhere in a few short years.
This bill gives television producers that peace of mind by providing inflation adjusted annual funding for the Empire State Film Tax Credit program. A simple funding extension would only delay the problem instead of providing the genuine solution that is called for. This bill does not increase the percentage of production costs eligible for a tax cred- it, and it only increases the aggregate total insofar as is necessary to keep pace with inflation. Consequently, the State would remain largely insulated from risk while seeing increased benefits.
Between 2002 and 2009 the number of states offering film-production tax credits rose from 5 to 44. The vast majority of those states offer more substantial credits to individual productions than New York, and many are considering increasing the percentage of costs that can be credited still further. Fortunately, New York does not need to take part in this film tax credit arms race. Television production companies want to come here, even if it costs more. They simply want to be assured that funding for the program will still be in place when their shows become profita- ble. If we are to continue to attract top-shelf television productions we must make certain that our own program follows the basic dictates of common sense. This bill provides that common sense solution.
Legislative history
This is a new bill.
Fiscal implications
To be determined.
Effective date
This act shall take effect immediately.
Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.