Skip to content
S2896Senate2013-2014 SessionSame asA4452

Allows a plaintiff to have a small claims court hearing in the municipality in which the claim arose

Sponsor James L. SewardSD-51Affects Legal
Status
In Senate Committee
Judiciary
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Judiciary

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
James L. Seward

Senator · Senate District 51

Chair, Insurance

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Referred to judiciary
  2. Referred to judiciary

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A4452Assembly

Allows a plaintiff to have a small claims court hearing in the municipality in which the claim arose

In Assembly Committee · Judiciary · Sponsor Marc Butler

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

BILL NUMBER:S2896

Title of bill

An act to amend the New York city civil court act, the uniform city court act, the uniform district court act and the uniform justice court act, in relation to the location of a small claims proceeding

Purpose

The purpose of this bill is to make the provisions governing where a small claims proceeding may be brought more equitable by author- izing small claims cases to be brought where the claim arose, in addi- tion to the other currently permissible locations

Summary of provisions

Amends sections 1801 of the New York city civil court act, the uniform city court act, the uniform district court act and the uniform justice court act to authorize small claims cased to brought in the location where the claim arose

Existing law

Current law only permits small claims cases to be brought where the defendant resides or has an office for the transaction of business or a regular employment.

Justification

Under current law, small claims cases may be brought where the defendant resides or has an office for the transaction of business or a regular employment. This bill would also allow such claims to be filed where the claim arose.

The current law can be unreasonably burdensome to the plaintiff in a small claims proceeding. For example, small businesses which sell some- thing or provide a service and are not paid should not be required to bring a small claims action where the defendant resides or is employed in order to receive payment. This can be particularly troublesome when the defendant resides out of town and was traveling through the area where the goods or services were acquired for which payment was not provided This bill would make the provisions regarding where a small claims action may be brought more equitable

Legislative history

S.7153 of 2007-08

Fiscal implications

None

Effective date

Immediately

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.