Skip to content
S2929Senate2013-2014 SessionSame asA4272

Creates a crime of leading a retail theft enterprise

Sponsor Lee M. ZeldinSD-3+2 co-sponsorsAffects Legal
Status
In Senate Committee
Codes
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Codes

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Lee M. Zeldin

Senator · Senate District 3

Chair, Consumer Protection

History

  1. Referred to codes
  2. Returned to senate
  3. Died in assembly
  4. Referred to codes
  5. Delivered to assembly
  6. Passed senateVote 61–0
  7. Advanced to third reading
  8. 2nd report cal.
  9. 1st report cal.215
  10. Reported and committed to consumer protection
  11. Referred to codes

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A4272Assembly

Creates a crime of leading a retail theft enterprise

In Assembly Committee · Codes · Sponsor Michael Cusick

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

BILL NUMBER:S2929

Title of bill

An act to amend the penal law, in relation to creating a crime of leading a retail theft enterprise

Purpose or general idea of bill

This bill relates to prohibitions and penalties against persons who lead an organized retail theft enterprise by organizing, supervising, financing or managing such criminal activ- ity.

Summary of provisions

Section One amends the penal law by adding a new section 150.50 which defines the circumstances that would give rise to the crime of leading an organized retail theft enterprise. The terms "anti-shoplifting or inventory control device countermeasures", "conceal", "full retail value", "merchandise", "merchant", "organized retail theft", "organized retail theft enterprise", "person", "premises of a store or retail mercantile establishment", "shoplifting", "store or other retail mercan- tile establishment", and "under-ring" are defined for purposes of this section.

Section Two provides that the crime of leading an organized retail theft enterprise constitutes a grand larceny in the second degree and is a class C felony.

Section Three is the effective date.

Justification

This bill is part of a package of legislation that seeks to cut down on patterns of criminal activity that rise to the level of "organized retail theft". According to the Federal Bureau of Investi- gation, organized retail theft costs United States retailers about $30 billion per year. Organized retail crime comprises a wide spectrum of high volume and highly organized theft rings that cost New York retail- ers specifically hundreds of millions of dollars annually and, more importantly, compromise the health, safety, and welfare of unsuspecting New York consumers. For every item stolen, New York State and local governments lose out on sales tax revenue- again, adding up to millions annually.

Organized retail theft is the most serious security issue facing many retail merchants, including apparel and accessory retailers, mass merchandisers, do-it-yourself stores, drug stores, and supermarkets. It's a crime that has grown substantially over the past decade, and has continued to grow at unprecedented level. Retailers are forced to offset these significant costs through higher prices - meaning that honest consumers are forced to endure the impact of organized retail theft and professional shoplifters.

Those individuals who lead retail theft crime rings should be punished to the fullest extent possible. By amending the penal-law to allow those

convicted of leading an organized retail theft enterprise to be charged with higher level felonies, the chain of persons involved in these types of schemes can be deterred and cut off from the top.

Legislative history

S.6959B (of 2012) passed in the Senate.

Fiscal implications

None.

Effective date

This act shall take effect on the first of November next succeeding the date on which it shall have become a law.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.