Skip to content
S3314Senate2013-2014 Session

Enacts the automated sales suppression act

Sponsor Liz KruegerSD-28+3 co-sponsorsAffects Finance
Status
In Senate Committee
Finance
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Finance

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Liz Krueger

Senator · Senate District 28

History

  1. Referred to finance
  2. Referred to finance

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

BILL NUMBER:S3314

Title of bill

An act to amend the executive law, in relation to enacting the automated sales suppression act

Purpose

1. Requires the Department Of Taxation and Finance to prepare an automated sales tax suppression study.

Summary of provisions

§ 170-c. Automated Sales Suppression Study.

1. Definitions.

2. Directs the Department of Taxation and Finance to prepare a comprehensive study on the prevalence of automated sales suppression technology (e.g. zappers and phantom-ware) within the state's retail industry, focusing on, but not limited to, restaurants, movie theaters, hairdressers, amusement parks, grocery stores and convenience stores.

3. Automated Sales Suppression report deadline.

4. Report information exemptions.

Existing law

None.

Justification

For years, foreign countries with national sales taxes have struggled to combat technology that enables retailers to skim sales taxes and under report other tax liabilities (e.g. personal income tax, corporate income tax) by concealing from auditors their actual sales data. This technology, which includes so-called "zappers" and "phantom-ware.," automatically suppresses digital sales figures recorded at electronic cash registers.

It is difficult for auditors to detect the use of zappers and phantom-ware through the traditional process of cross checking transaction documents because the technology conceals almost all traces of the digital manipulation. Countries such as Germany and Greece have required retailers to install technological countermeasures that make it easier for auditors to detect the use of zappers and phantom-ware. In September 2010, the Canadian province of Quebec began requiring all restaurants to install in their electronic cash registers anti-sales suppression devices. Zappers cost Quebec an estimated $425 million ($410 million U.S.) in 2007-2008.

Because the United States lacks a national sales tax, there is no federal initiative to combat this tax fraud and most states are ill-prepared to deal with this issue. Nationwide, only a handful of people have been caught using this technology, including two in.Michigan and one in Connecticut. Richard T. Ainsworth, a Boston University school of Law tax professor and a leading expert on zappers, has published several papers documenting the spread of zappers and phantom-ware in Quebec, Greece, Germany, the Netherlands

and other European nations. Given that that the first zappers were made in the United States and that this technology is widely used in the Canadian province just above of the New York's northern border, it is imperative for the State to address this issue.

Prior to requiring restaurants in the province to install anti-automated sales suppression technology in electronic cash registers, Quebec conducted two empirical studies on the problem. This legislation, likewise, would direct and authorize the Department of Taxation and Finance to prepare a study on the prevalence of zappers and phantom-ware in cash-oriented businesses statewide, such as restaurants, movie theaters and convenience stores.

Fiscal impacts

Approximately $250,000 to cover auditor expenses throughout the 18-month study and to produce a report, according to an estimate by the Senate Select Committee on Budget and Tax Reform.

Effective date

This act shall take effect ninety days after enactment.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.