Skip to content
S4036Senate2013-2014 SessionSame asA2962

Prohibits foreign banking corporations from issuing payday loans

Sponsor Malcolm A. SmithSD-14Affects Finance
Status
In Senate Committee
Banks
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Banks

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Malcolm A. Smith

Senator · Senate District 14

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Referred to banks
  2. Referred to banks

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A2962Assembly

Prohibits foreign banking corporations from issuing payday loans

In Assembly Committee · Banks · Sponsor Keith L.T. Wright

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

BILL NUMBER:S4036

Title of bill

An act to amend the banking law and the general obligations law, in relation to prohibiting foreign banking corporations from engaging in high-cost payday loans

Purpose or general idea of bill

To prohibit foreign banking corporations from issuing payday loans.

Read the full memo (700 words)

Summary of specific provisions

Amends § 202 of the Banking Law and § 5 of the general obligations law to accomplish the above stated purpose.

Explanation of the legislation

Banking corporations that are outside of New York should be prohibited from making payday loans because the annual percentage rates on these loans are astronomical, many lenders use shady tactics to collect payments, and they also target those with low income. According to recent studies the predatory lending industry has been rapidly growing across the country. This includes payday loan companies which offer small sum, short-term, high-rate, unsecured personal loans. These loans go by many names, including "payday loans," "cash advance loans," "postdated check loans" or "deferred deposits." Payday lenders advance cash loans to consumers who agree to repay the amount, plus a finance fee, with a post-dated check. The lender agrees to hold the check until the customer's next payday, up to 30 days. At that time, the borrower may redeem the check with cash, allow the lender to deposit the check or roll over the loan by paying another fee.

For example, an individual borrows $200 until his/her next paycheck. That individual writes a postdated check to a payday lender for $230 (15% of $200 = $30 lender's fee + $200 loan amount = $230) and get $200 cash in return. The $30 fee for the loan calculates to an Annual Percentage Rate (APR) of 391%. The payday lender may also charge you a one-time fee of $10 to setup an account_ If the loan cannot be repaid in the agreed-upon 14 days, the individual may elect to extend the loan for another two weeks by paying an additional $30. A rollover of the loan will then have a $60 lender's fee for a one-month loan of $200. If the loan is extended for a total of six months, a person ends up paying $360 in fees, without having paid back any of the principal (the original $200).

On average, consumers are now paying 400 percent or more for Payday loans. Payday lenders can also resort to bullying tactics, such as threatening criminal prosecution for writing a bad check, leaving borrowers with few options but to rollover the debt or default on other debts. Moreover, payday lenders target the working poor. For those living paycheck to paycheck, with little or no ability to secure credit from banks for loans large or small, payday loans may appear the only alternative for quick cash, irrespective of the interest rate. Therefore, lenders are able to take advantage of low-income borrowers.

A study conducted by The Woodstock Institute found that 19 percent of payday loan customers make less than $15,000 a year, and another 38 percent make between $15,000 and $25,000. The Woodstock Institute's report also noted that debt is steadily increasing while personal savings are decreasing for low-income households.

This legislation ensures that no foreign banking corporation shall make any payday loans, either directly or indirectly. It preserves the ability of the state to protect consumers against abusive payday lending practices. In New York, lenders would be in violation of 190.40 of the New York State Penal Code if the loan advanced results in an annual interest rate in excess of 25 percent. Since there are strict restrictions placed on payday lenders in New York State, payday lenders ally with out-of-state banking corporations to get around state laws. This bill would eliminate this loop hole and provide consumers with affordable interest rates on loans.

Justification

This bill would protect consumers against abusive payday lending practices that have become a serious issue given the economic climate. The state should do everything it can to ensure New Yorkers aren't taken advantage of by unscrupulous actors.

PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:;

2011: A.3288 2009: A.1484 2007: a.722 2005-06: A.850 2003-04: A.3480

Fiscal implications

None.

Effective date

This act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it shall have become a law.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.