What's happening
Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.
Why it matters
Albany, before your first meeting.
Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.
Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.
Who cares
Headline styles
Sponsors
Senator · Senate District 57
History
- Referred to judiciary
- Delivered to assembly
- Passed senateVote 58–0
- Advanced to third reading
- 2nd report cal.
- 1st report cal.79
- Referred to judiciary
- Returned to senate
- Died in assembly
- Referred to judiciary
- Delivered to assembly
- Passed senateVote 61–1
Show 4 earlier actions
- Advanced to third reading
- 2nd report cal.
- 1st report cal.1018
- Referred to judiciary
Companion bill
The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.
Relates to the location of presiding judge at arraignment, appearance proceedings and pursuant to a warrant
In Assembly Committee · Judiciary · Sponsor Sandy Galef
Full text
The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.
Sponsor's memo
BILL NUMBER:S4336
Title of bill
An act to amend the uniform justice court act, in relation to the location of the presiding justice in certain circumstances
Purpose
Relates to the location of presiding judge at arraignment, appearance proceedings and pursuant to a warrant
Summary of provisions
Section 1. Amends section 106 of the uniform justice court act to provide that for purposes of arraignments, appearance proceedings or pursuant to warrant, a town or village justice may preside anywhere in the county given specified conditions.
Section 2. Effective Date
Justification
Currently, a justice from a town where a misdemeanor offense occurs is called first, and if he/she is not available, police are limited to a justice from a contiguous municipality. In some instances, this has not provided an appropriate fail safe for timely arraignments. In fact, it has been reported, that on occasion, town justices were unavailable or unable to respond to police requests to perform arraignment. This not only leads to court inefficiencies but also consumes the time of law enforcement while waiting for a justice to be located to arraign the perpetrator.
In general, informal agreements are utilized to make sure that a justice is available at all times, however, this has not proven to be reliable in some instances. This bill allows the chief administrator of the courts to create a formal emergency plan that would include a system of backup justices available when all other options have been exhausted.
Legislative history
S. 6665 of 2012: Referred to Judiciary
Fiscal implications
None.
Effective date
This act shall take effect immediately.
Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.