Skip to content
S5635Senate2013-2014 Session

Relates to the prevention of terrorist attacks

Sponsor Greg BallSD-40Affects Local Government
Status
In Senate Committee
Veterans, Homeland Security And Military Affairs
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Veterans, Homeland Security And Military Affairs

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Greg Ball

Senator · Senate District 40

Chair, Veterans, Homeland Security And Military Affairs

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Referred to veterans, homeland security and military affairs
  2. Referred to veterans, homeland security and military affairs

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

BILL NUMBER:S5635

Title of bill

An act to amend the executive law, the criminal procedure law, and the penal law, in relation to the prevention of terrorist attacks

Purpose

This bill would authorize any peace or police officer to consider the national origin as one of many factors which could be used in identifying persons who can be initially stopped, questioned, frisked and/or searched in furtherance of government's compelling interest in deterring terrorist attacks.

Read the full memo (715 words)

Summary of specific provisions

Section One of this bill would declare the legislative findings and intent of this proposed legislation.

Section Two of this bill would amend the Executive Law, to add a new section 837-s, to allow a peace officer or police officer to consider the apparent national origin of a suspect as one of the many factors in a potential terrorist suspect profile which he or she could use to identify persons who could be stopped, questioned, frisked and/or searched in furtherance of the government's compelling interest in deterring terrorist attacks: provided that the apparent national origin cannot be the sole criteria utilized for making the decision.

Section Three of this bill would amend the Criminal Procedure Law, to add a new section 140.60, to allow a peace officer or police officer to consider the apparent national origin of a suspect as one of the many factors in a potential terrorist suspect profile which he or she could use to identify persons who could be stopped, questioned, frisked and/or searched in furtherance of the government's compelling interest in deterring terrorist attacks: provided that the apparent national origin cannot be the sole criteria utilized for making the decision.

Section Four of this bill would amend the Penal Law to add a new section 490.02, to provide that a person who makes a good faith stop of a person based upon their national origin, pursuant to section 837-s of the Executive Law or section 140.60 of the criminal procedure law, would be immune from from civil and criminal liability for such stop, questioning, frisk or search.

Justification

The Supreme Court of the United States held in Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), that factors such as race, ethnicity and national origin can, consistent with the Equal Protection clause of the U.S Constitution, be considered in making governmental decisions provided that:

(1) Such consideration serves a "compelling governmental interest" and

(2) That race, ethnicity or national origin is not the only factor to be considered in making the decisions.

Preventing terrorist attacks on our citizens - including not only possible deaths and injuries, but also the resulting economic harm and devastation - is the very definition of a compelling governmental

interest. Accordingly, this compelling governmental interest demands - that since both law enforcement resources and the time necessary to make an initial decision regarding stopping and questioning are very limited - the identification of potential terrorist suspect as effectively and efficiently as possible, so that they may be stopped, questioned, frisked, or searched, is an important tool to prevent terrorist attack.

The recent events of the Boston Marathon Attacks, only highlights the need for this type of legislation. For that tragedy clearly demonstrated that our law enforcement officials must be provided with the ability to detain and prevent terrorist suspects from carrying out their murderous plans. Being able to stop, question and search terrorist suspects, when law enforcement has a good faith suspicion that the individual to be stopped, questioned, frisked or searched has ties to any country which has had a history of maintaining a terrorist organization.

By its very text, this bill does not seek authorize the a practice of racial or ethnic discrimination. Rather it seeks to have law enforcement to be permitted to operate in the real world, where terrorists do in fact frequently come from certain nationalities and backgrounds, and have their hands inappropriately tied in their mission to protect us, due to a misplaced policy of political correctness.

As a result, this bill seeks, in the interest of ensuring the most effective terrorist prevention which meets U.S. constitutional protections, to enact a law which authorizes the effective use of potential suspect terrorist profiles

Legislative history

This is a new bill in the Senate.

Fiscal implications

None noted

Effective date

This act would take effect immediately.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.