Skip to content
S6508Senate2013-2014 SessionSame asA9072

Relates to the distribution of dividends

Sponsor James L. SewardSD-51Affects Finance
Status
In Assembly Committee
Insurance
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 5 of 7

In Assembly · Insurance

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
James L. Seward

Senator · Senate District 51

Chair, Insurance

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Referred to insurance
  2. Delivered to assembly
  3. Passed senateVote 59–0
  4. Advanced to third reading
  5. 2nd report cal.
  6. 1st report cal.491
  7. Referred to insurance

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A9072Assembly

Relates to the distribution of dividends

In Assembly Committee · Insurance · Sponsor Anthony Brindisi

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

BILL NUMBER:S6508

Title of bill

An act to amend the insurance law, in relation to distribution of dividends by domestic stock life insurers

Purpose

This bill would amend § 4207(a) of the insurance law to revise the standard for determining when domestic stock life insurers may distribute dividends to the shareholders of domestic stock life insur- ance companies.

Summary of provisions

Subsection (a) of § 4207 of the insurance law authorizes domestic stock life insurers to distribute shareholder divi- dends when such insurer does not exceed the specified threshold test provided for in the law. This bill amends § 4207(a)(1) to provide that the standard for the threshold test should be that the aggregate amount of such insurer's dividends in any calendar year must not exceed the "greater of" either: 10% of surplus to policyholders, as of the imme- diately preceding calendar year, or; its net gain from operations for the immediately preceding calendar year, excluding realized capital gains. Current law establishes this test using the "lesser of" either 10% of surplus to policyholders or net gain from operations.

Justification

Contrary to the law in 33 other states, current New York insurance law provides that New York stock life insurers may only distribute dividends to shareholders when the aggregate amount of such dividends does not exceed the "lesser of" either: 10% of surplus to policyholders; or net gain from operations in the immediately preceding calendar year, excluding realized capital gains. Although New York law is consistent with the provisions of section 5.B of the National Associ- ation of Insurance Commissioner's (NAIC) Insurance Holding Company System Regulatory Act, most other states have not followed this provision and have, instead, authorized domestic stock life insurer's in their states to utilize this same threshold test using a "greater of" standard. The "greater of" standard is provided for in the laws of states that have a substantial presence of domestic life insurance companies and a history of strong insurance regulation, such as Califor- nia, Connecticut, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minne- sota, New Jersey and Texas.

This bill amends the insurance law in New York regarding the distrib- ution of shareholder dividends by New York stock life insurers to bring it into conformance with the laws of the vast majority of the rest of the country. This change will allow New York stock life insurers to be regulated and reviewed by credit rating organizations on the matter of shareholder distributions in the same manner as their competitors in other states. The amendments provided for in this bill have been the law in most other states with a substantial domestic life insurance presence for many years, with no negative financial consequences to stock life insurers or their policyholders. Therefore, it would seem logical to place New York domestic insurers on the same competitive playing field as their out-of-state competitors by enacting this legislation.

Legislative history

New bill.

Fiscal implications

None.

Effective date

Immediately.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.