Skip to content
S6826Senate2013-2014 SessionSame asA9325

Enhances the criminal classifications for identity theft and related crimes

Sponsor Martin J. GoldenSD-22Affects Legal
Status
In Assembly Committee
Codes
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 5 of 7

In Assembly · Codes

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Martin J. Golden

Senator · Senate District 22

Chair, Civil Service And Pensions

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Referred to codes
  2. Delivered to assembly
  3. Passed senateVote 56–1
  4. Ordered to third reading cal.1346
  5. Committee discharged and committed to rules
  6. Print number 6826b
  7. Amend and recommit to codes
  8. Print number 6826a
  9. Amend and recommit to codes
  10. Referred to codes

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A9325Assembly

Enhances the criminal classifications for identity theft and related crimes

In Assembly Committee · Codes · Sponsor Steven Cymbrowitz

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

BILL NUMBER:S6826B

Title of bill

An act to amend the penal law, in relation to identity theft and related crimes

Purpose

This bill enhances the criminal classifications for identity theft and related crimes.

Read the full memo (653 words)

Summary of provisions

Section one amends the closing paragraph of section 190.23 of the penal law to reclassify "False personation" as a Class A misdemeanor.

Section 2 amends the closing paragraph of section 190.25 of the penal law to reclassify "criminal impersonation in the second degree" as a class E felony.

Section 3 amends the closing paragraph of section 190.26 of the penal law as to reclassify "criminal impersonation in the first degree" as a class D felony.

Section 4 amends the closing paragraph of section 190.78 of the penal law to reclassify the crime of "identity theft in the third degree" as a class E felony.

Section 5 amends the closing paragraph of section 190.79 of the penal law to reclassify the crime of "identity theft in the second degree" as a class D felony.

Section 6 amends the closing paragraph of section 190.80 of the penal law to reclassify the crime of "identity theft in the first degree" as a class C felony.

Section 7 amends the closing paragraph of section 190.85 of the penal law to reclassify the crime of "unlawful possession of a skimmer device in the second degree" as a class E felony.

Section 8 amends the second undesignated paragraph of section 190.86 of the penal law to reclassify the crime of "unlawful possession of a skimmer device in the first degree" as a class D felony.

Section 9 amends the closing paragraph of section 190.80-a of the penal law to reclassify the "crime of aggravated identity theft" as a class C felony.

Section 10 amends the closing paragraph of section 190.81 of the penal law to reclassify the crime of "unlawful possession of personal identification information in the third degree" as a class E felony.

Section 11 amends the second undesignated paragraph of section 190.82 of the penal law to reclassify the crime of "unlawful possession of personal identification information in the second degree" as a class D felony.

Section 12 amends section 190.83 of the penal law to reclassify the crime of "unlawful possession of personal identification in the first degree as a class C felony.

Section 13 provides that this act shall take effect on the first of November after it shall have become law and shall apply only to offenses committed after such a date.

Justification

The last six months has had the news media filled with stories of data breaches in data security surrounding some of our most famous retailers such as Target and Neiman Marcus. In the case of the Target data breach it is estimated that the breach affected almost 110 million customers of the retail chain and apart from the devastating effects the breach has had on customers the breach has cost Target $17 million and has caused customers to steer clear of the chain as the company's net earnings were down 46%. According to data compiled by the Consumer Bankers Association and the Credit Union National Association the cost of replacing credit and debit cards impacted by the breach costs around $200 million. According to the most recent reports the Neiman Marcus breach affected about 350,000 customers and of that 9,200 of the cards that have been compromised are believed to have been used fraudulently since the breach occurred. The impact on the customers affected, the stores involved and the financial institutions that issue the cards is enormous and identity theft and credit card fraud is a lucrative business. The penalties faced by those individuals brazen enough to commit such crimes must be increased so that the punishment adequately fits the crime.

Legislative history

New Bill

Fiscal implications

None

Effective date

First of November after it shall become law and shall apply to all offenses thereafter.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.