Skip to content
S7143Senate2013-2014 SessionSame asA9314

Relates to business records of non-parties

Sponsor John J. BonacicSD-42Affects Legal
Status
Signed by Governor
Impact
Pending
Outcome
Signed into law

Bill progress

Signed into law

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
John J. Bonacic

Senator · Senate District 42

Chair, JudiciaryChair, Racing, Gaming And Wagering

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Signed chap.314
  2. Delivered to governor
  3. Returned to senate
  4. Passed assembly
  5. Ordered to third reading rules cal.193
  6. Substituted for A9314
  7. Referred to judiciary
  8. Delivered to assembly
  9. Passed senateVote 60–0
  10. Advanced to third reading
  11. 2nd report cal.
  12. 1st report cal.525
Show 1 earlier action
  1. Referred to judiciary

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A9314Assembly

Relates to business records of non-parties

Assembly Floor Calendar · Sponsor Helene Weinstein

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

BILL NUMBER:S7143

Title of bill

An act to amend the civil practice law and rules, in relation to business records of non-parties

This is one in a series of measures being introduced at the request of the Chief Administrative Judge upon the recommendation of her Advisory Committee on Civil Practice.

Rule 3122-a of the CPLR was adopted to facilitate the introduction of business records produced by third parties either in discovery or for trial. It eliminates the need to bring in a custodian or other witness to testify to the authenticity of records by allowing such a custodian or other qualifying witness to provide a certification to that effect accompanying the documents.

One serious limitation to rule 3122-a in its present form is that it applies only to business records produced pursuant to a subpoena duces tecum under rule 3120. We see no reason that this desirable procedure should be limited to records produced solely by subpoena. In many cases, documents may be produced by third parties voluntarily, and those parties should not be put to the inconvenience of having to produce a witness to testify at trial as to the authenticity, regularity and completeness of the documents. Thus, we propose that rule 3122-a be amended to add a new subdivision allowing its certification procedures to apply to all business records produced by non-parties whether or not pursuant to subpoena.

It bears noting that any party may object to the procedure set forth in rule 3122-a after receiving notice from the party intending to use that procedure to introduce business records at trial. If the court sustains the objection, the introducing party will need to bring in a witness at trial to testify to lay the foundation for admission of the documents. Further, rule 3122-a does not supplant the procedure set forth in CPLR 2306 as to the introduction of hospital and municipal records at trial. A party seeking to introduce those records may still rely upon the procedure set forth in section 2306 or, alternatively, may follow the rule 3122-a procedures.

This measure, which would have no fiscal impact on the public treasury, would take effect immediately.

Legislative History:

None. New Proposal.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.