Skip to content
S7331Senate2013-2014 SessionSame asA9643

Increases the portion of public pension fund assets that may be invested according to the prudent investor standard

Sponsor John A. DeFranciscoSD-50+1 co-sponsorAffects Finance
Status
Senate Floor Calendar
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Vetoed via A9643

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
John A. DeFrancisco

Senator · Senate District 50

Chair, Finance

1 Co-sponsor

History

  1. Substituted by A9643A
  2. Amended on third reading 7331a
  3. Advanced to third reading
  4. 2nd report cal.
  5. 1st report cal.995
  6. Referred to civil service and pensions

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A9643Assembly

Increases the portion of public pension fund assets that may be invested according to the prudent investor standard

Vetoed · Sponsor Herman D. Farrell

Vetoed

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

BILL NUMBER:S7331A

Title of bill

An act to amend the retirement and social security law, in relation to investments by public pension funds

Purpose

This bill increases the portion of public pension fund assets that may be invested.

Read the full memo (610 words)

Summary of provisions

Section 1 amends paragraph 1 of subdivision 9 of section 177 of the Retirement and Social Security Law to increase from 25% to 30% the portion of a public pension fund's assets that may be invested.

Section 2 provides for an immediate effective date.

Discussion

In order to maximize risk-adjusted returns and meet its actuarial targets, the New York City Retirement Systems (NYCRS) has increased its exposure to alternative investment classes over time. This action was in keeping with the evolution of capital markets and in line with the actions of other large government pension funds. As the investment advisors and trustees look forward to the market challenges that lay ahead, they see the need to increase the basket clause limit from 25% to 30%. This limit will allow for a superior risk-adjusted portfolio and for additional flexibility to reduce portfolio volatility while maintaining superior returns. In addition, this change would better equip the funds' advisors and trustees to tactically manage the investments to take advantage of market trends, react to market shocks and avoid potentially costly rebalances or unwinds at inopportune times.

The basket clause has been increased multiple times. The original basket clause limit was established at 5% in 1982. The law was amended in 1987 to increase the limit to 7.5%, in 1997 to 15%, and in 2006 to 25%. With each increase, public pension funds have been in a better position to manage volatility. The current 25% limitation on basket clause investments provides a relatively small allocation to non-legal list investments through the 25% basket clause allocation.

Rationale for the change

As discussed below, volatility and illiquidity prevent NYCRS from using the entire allocation. As a result,investments that could provide diversification - such as certain high yield bonds, bonds denominated in foreign currencies, various commodities, and other investments - are not available to NYCRS.

The current twenty five percent limitation on basket investments has become problematic given current low expected market returns.

Under the current 25% cap, most of the investments allocated to the basket are illiquid, longterm private equity partnerships. In addition, NYCRS' international investments, to the extent they exceed the 10% permitted by the legal list, must be counted against the basket cap. The private equity investments involve a long-term commitment for NYCRS to make additional investments, and the timing of these investments is subject to ever-changing market conditions and is difficult to forecast. NYCRS must account for both the actual value of

private equity investments as well as future contractual commitments to provide capital when measuring compliance with the 25% basket clause allocation.

The portion of the NYCRS portfolios allocated to public equities is much more volatile than the investments allocated to the basket. As a result, a swing in public markets can push NYCRS dangerously close to the investment cap with no new investments.

Expansion of the basket to 30% is critical in providing public pension advisors and trustees greater ability to mitigate market volatility and structure superior risk-adjusted portfolios. Increasing a fund's ability to invest according to the expanded standard will result in increased flexibility, thereby enabling trustees to monitor investments closely without restricting their ability to respond effectively to changing market conditions.

Conclusion

In sum, NYCRS is prevented from creating an optimal investment portfolio. The current 25% limitation on the basket clause investments prevents NYCRS from investing in a number of attractive asset classes and strategies.

Effective date

Immediately.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.