Skip to content
S7332Senate2013-2014 SessionSame asA9577

Provides that court withdrawal actions must be commenced in the court which had original jurisdiction of the underlying matter

Sponsor John A. DeFranciscoSD-50Affects Finance
Status
Senate Floor Calendar
Impact
Pending
Outcome
Companion signed

Bill progress

Signed via A9577

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
John A. DeFrancisco

Senator · Senate District 50

Chair, Finance

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Substituted by A9577
  2. Advanced to third reading
  3. 2nd report cal.
  4. 1st report cal.959
  5. Referred to finance

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A9577Assembly

Provides that court withdrawal actions must be commenced in the court which had original jurisdiction of the underlying matter

Signed by Governor · Sponsor Herman D. Farrell

Signed into law

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

BILL NUMBER:S7332

Title of bill

An act to amend the abandoned property law, in relation to withdrawal actions

Purpose

The purpose of this legislation is to clarify that court withdrawal actions must be commenced in the court of original jurisdiction and specifically bars the commencement of court withdrawal actions as special proceedings against the State Comptroller.

Summary of provisions

Section 1 amends Subdivision 2 of section 1406 of the abandoned property law to increase from five to ten thousand dollars the amount of a claim for any abandoned property paid to the State that may be established only on order of the court which had original jurisdiction of the underlying matter, after service of notice upon the State Comptroller and upon due notice to all parties to the action or proceeding which resulted in the monies being paid into court (court withdrawal action.)

Also, provides that such court withdrawal action must be commenced in the court which had jurisdiction over the underlying matter using the court index number of that original action and further provides that no such withdrawal action shall be brought as a special proceeding against the State Comptroller.

Prior legislative history

New bill.

Justification

Recently, certain courts have held that court withdrawal actions to recover moneys paid into court and then subsequently turned over to the Office of the State Comptroller pursuant to the Abandoned Property Law should be brought as a special proceeding against the State Comptroller rather than what it actually is, simply a reopening of the original underlying action involving the same parties who were parties in the original action.

Therefore, it is necessary to clarify in statute that the court withdrawal actions must be commenced in the court of original jurisdiction and specifically bar the commencement of court withdrawal actions as special proceedings against the State Comptroller.

The proposal also increases the threshold for such withdrawal actions from five thousand to ten thousand where the underlying court record established someone's entitlement to court deposited funds now held by the State Comptroller (and such amount is below the threshold.) If the claimant can establish, by means of proof; to the State Comptroller that the claimant is the person who the court determined is entitled to the funds, the funds may be paid to such claimant without obtaining a court order thereby saving legal fees. This almost exclusively would apply in estate matters where the funds were clearly deposited for a known but unlocated distributee or legatee who later appears to claim the inheritance.

Fiscal implications for state

This bill has no significant State fiscal impact.

Effective date

This act shall take effect immediately.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.