Skip to content
S7367Senate2013-2014 SessionSame asA9861

Provides for the issuance of local refunding bonds which do not exceed the amounts and maturity of the bonds which they refund

Sponsor Andrew J. LanzaSD-24Affects Local Government
Status
Vetoed
Impact
Pending
Outcome
Vetoed

Bill progress

Vetoed

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Andrew J. Lanza

Senator · Senate District 24

Chair, Cities

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Vetoed memo.522
  2. Delivered to governor
  3. Returned to senate
  4. Passed assembly
  5. Ordered to third reading rules cal.498
  6. Substituted for A9861
  7. Referred to local governments
  8. Delivered to assembly
  9. Passed senateVote 56–1
  10. Ordered to third reading cal.1354
  11. Committee discharged and committed to rules
  12. Referred to local government

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A9861Assembly

Provides for the issuance of local refunding bonds which do not exceed the amounts and maturity of the bonds which they refund

Assembly Floor Calendar · Sponsor Herman D. Farrell

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

BILL NUMBER:S7367

Title of bill

An act to amend the local finance law, in relation to the refunding and advance refunding of bonds

Purpose

This bill provides for the issuance of local refunding bonds which do not exceed the amounts and maturity of the bonds which they refund.

Summary of provisions

Section 1 of the bill amends paragraph b-i of section 90.00 of the local finance law, as added by chapter 201 of the laws of 1994.

Section 2 of the bill states that subdivision 3 of paragraph c of section 90.10 of the local finance law, as amended by chapter 201 of the laws of 1994.

Section 3 of the bill outlines the severability of this bill.

Section 4 is the effective date.

Justification

Under existing law, refunding bonds must comply with the fifty percent rule or have level or declining debt service. To meet these require- ments, a refunding of a single maturity in a series must also refund bonds which yield no present value savings, but are included only to conform the refunding issue to the requirement of Local Finance Law. This restriction causes these structuring bonds to be refunded prema- turely, wasting potential present value savings, because tax-exempt bonds generally may be refunded only once under applicable federal tax laws. The provisions of this bill broaden an issuer's ability to utilize advance refunding bonds by allowing, as an alternative, the amounts and stated maturities of the refunding bonds to be set by reference to the refunded bonds. This eliminates the requirement to include structuring bonds that provide no present value savings in a refunding issue. This in turn allows for targeted refunding of a single or limited number of maturities without triggering a pre-payment of principal. The bill protects the portions of the Local Finance Law that prevent balloon payments and that assure bonds are not outstanding longer than neces- sary, because these provisions remain fully applicable to the original bonds to be refunded. In addition, the structure of the City's overall indebtedness is preserved since the refunding bonds simply replace the bonds originally issued.

The consequences of the unprecedented global financial, liquidity and credit crisis continue to play out in the market, leading many of the banks that had provided liquidity support for the City's variable rate bonds to withdraw or announce their future withdrawal from that busi- ness. Targeted refundings are an essential tool to address the issue of

banks' not renewing their liquidity facilities, which, absent a refund- ing, could result in bank-held bonds that not only revert to higher rates increasing the City's debt service expenses, but often trigger "term-out" provisions that require accelerated repayment of those bonds. Correcting the technical restriction on targeted refunding will better equip the City to specifically address the issues of the financial and credit crisis without exposing taxpayers to the risks of increased debt service or principal acceleration on City bonds.

Legislative history

2012: S.7665 - Referred to Rules / A.10242 - Referred to Local Govern- ment.

Fiscal implications

None.

Effective date

This act shall take effect immediately.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.