Skip to content
S7810Senate2013-2014 SessionSame asA9970

Relates to provisional employees of certain public employers

Sponsor Martin J. GoldenSD-22Affects Finance
Status
Senate Floor Calendar
Impact
Pending
Outcome
Companion signed

Bill progress

Signed via A9970

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Martin J. Golden

Senator · Senate District 22

Chair, Civil Service And Pensions

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Substituted by A9970
  2. Ordered to third reading cal.1683
  3. Committee discharged and committed to rules
  4. Referred to civil service and pensions

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A9970Assembly

Relates to provisional employees of certain public employers

Signed by Governor · Sponsor Peter Abbate

Signed into law

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

BILL NUMBER:S7810

Title of bill

An act to amend the civil service law, in relation to provisional employees of certain public employers; to amend chapter 5 of the laws of 2008 amending the civil service law relating to provisional employees of certain public employers, in relation to extensions of certain negotiated agreements and extending the provisions of such chapter; and to amend part I of chapter 56 of the laws of 2008 amending the civil service law relating to excess provisional employees of a city having a population of one million or more, in relation to extending the provisions thereof

Summary of provisions

Section 1 of the bill sets forth legislative findings, describing the need to amend subdivision 5 of Civil Service Law § 65, added by Chapter 5 of the Laws of 2008. Subdivision 5 provides for New York City (the "City") and the other governmental entities whose civil service appointments are managed by the city's Department of Citywide Administrative Services ("DCAS", and such entities are referred to as the "DCAS employers"), to develop a plan to substantially comply with the time periods permitted by subdivisions one through four of Civil Service Law § 65 regarding provisional appointments.

Read the full memo (989 words)

Section 2 of the bill would add a new paragraph (c-1) to Civil Service Law § 65(5) that would authorize the DCAS employers to submit to the State Civil Service Commission ("State Commission") a comprehensive revised plan, to be implemented by November 1, 2018 or within four years of its approval by the State Commission, whichever is later, to substantially comply with the time periods permitted by § 65(1)-(4). This plan could contain any of the components of the original plan and could also include other appropriate means of implementation. The State Commission would be required to approve or disapprove the plan within sixty days of its submission, and this approval process would otherwise conform to the procedures set forth in § 65(5)(c).

Section 3 of the bill would make conforming amendments to subdivisions (d), (f) and (g) of Civil Service Law § 65(5) in light of the proposed addition of a new paragraph (c-1). This would ensure that the plan modification procedures (including a potential additional year for implementing the revised plan), as well as the time limitation suspension and authorization of negotiated disciplinary procedures, would continue to apply.

Section 4 of the bill would make a conforming amendment to § 3 of Chapter 5 of the Laws of 2008 with respect to the negotiated agreements entered into as a result of the plan, reflecting the amendment to paragraph (g) of § 65(5) proposed by Section 3 of this bill. It would also amend the expiration date of Chapter 5 of the Laws of 2008, which authorized the original plan, and provide that this act would expire on December 31, 2020.

Section 5 of the bill would amend the expiration date of Part I of Chapter 56 of the Laws of 2008 (to December 31, 2020), which added subdivision 6 of § 65 authorizing the State Commission to charge the City for services and costs (up to $690,000 annually) associated with

approving and monitoring the plan submitted by the City and the DCAS employers.

Section 6 of the bill is a severability clause.

Section 7 of the bill provides that the act would take effect immediately.

Reasons for support

The City and the DCAS employers have made significant progress in reducing the number of their provisional employees, but aspects of the original plan developed by DCAS could not be fully implemented during the period of the plan's effective period. A comprehensive revision of such plan would now afford the City and the DCAS employers the opportunity to implement further actions necessary to complete the plan while preserving the quality and effectiveness of governmental operations.

The purpose of this bill, and the 2008 legislation it amends, is to address issues raised by the New York Court of Appeals in its decision in City of Long Beach v. Civil Service Employees Association, 8 N.Y.3d 465 (2007). In that case, the Court concluded that the terms of a collective bargaining agreement that afforded tenure rights to provisional employees of the City of Long Beach after one year of service were contrary to New York law. In light of this, the Court concluded that the dispute was not arbitrable because granting the relief sought by the provisional employees under the "tenure" provisions of the agreement would violate the Civil Service Law. The Court also emphasized the need for compliance with the time limitations imposed by Civil Service Law § 65 with respect to filling vacancies, holding examinations and removing provisional employees from positions in titles for which examinations should be held.

Having received approval in 2008 from the State Commission to implement an orderly and expeditious plan to reduce the number of provisional employees, the City and certain other related employers made substantial progress toward their goal through various means authorized by Chapter 5. As of May 1, 2014, the number of provisional employees on the payrolls of the DCAS employers is below 23,000, a substantial reduction of almost 15,000 from the number in May 2008. This bill would allow the City and such other employers to update and continue to implement the plan, with appropriate revisions to timeframes and plan strategies. The bill will ensure the continued quality and effectiveness of governmental operations while the revised plan is being developed and implemented. At the same time it will further the goals of maintaining continuity in the provision of essential public services and harmonious labor relations, particularly as it would allow limited negotiated protections regarding disciplinary procedures for provisional employees and the waiver of time limitations that would otherwise apply in relation to provisional employment. Such limited authorizations, only in the context of implementing the plan, are consistent with the "merit and fitness" policy of the State Constitution.

Effective Date:

Immediately, with provisions

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.