Skip to content
S1589Senate2015-2016 SessionSame asA1894

Provides for a limitation or remission of taxes on historic places

Sponsor Kenneth P. LaValleSD-1Affects Local Government
Status
In Senate Committee
Local Government
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Local Government

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Kenneth P. LaValle

Senator · Senate District 1

Chair, Higher Education

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Referred to local government
  2. Referred to local government

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A1894Assembly

Provides for a limitation or remission of taxes on historic places

In Assembly Committee · Ways And Means · Sponsor Fred Thiele

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

BILL NUMBER:S1589

Title of bill

An act to amend the town law and the general municipal law, in relation to the limitation or remission of taxes on historic places

Purpose

Provides for a limitation or remission of taxes on historic places.

Summary of provisions

Amends subdivision 17-a of Section 64 of the town law and Section 96-a of the general municipal law to allow any property owner whose property is within an historic district or designated an historic landmark to apply for a limitation or remission of the taxes assessed on said property to compensate said property owners for added costs, if any, of maintaining property in accordance with the requirements for historic districts or landmarks. Each municipality may establish a maximum amount or percentage of such limitation or remission and may provide that such limitation or remission shall only apply to properties designated as historic landmarks.

Justification

The character of a community is closely associated with its past through its many significant historic, architectural and cultural resources, all constituting part of its heritage. The protection, enhancement and perpetuation of these resources are necessary to promote its economic, cultural educational and general welfare. There is a need to provide incentives to encourage the designation and protection of historic structure.

Providing incentives for property owners, financial and otherwise, has proven to be an effective way to encourage local landmark and historic district designation, for example, the protection of the community's historic character, sense of place and distinctive identity. One of the most common requests by owners is a reduction in taxes. Examples of tax breaks for historically designated properties elsewhere in America, such as Austin, TX and Hillsborough, FL. Tax discounts, along with other programs, can help owners offset maintenance costs often associated with the stewardship of an historic structure. Providing the owners of such structures would only marginally affect the tax revenue of the community while providing a boost to its constituency's pride and connection to place.

Legislative history

2013-14 S.3011/A.3578.

Fiscal implications

To be determined.

Effective date

Immediately.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.